2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were also confirmed by Seckin et al [177]; the authors used 1, 4, 5, 6-tetrahydropyrimidine polymer compound to capture CO 2 and concluded that this method was more feasible compared to other CO 2 capture methods. The effectiveness of CO 2 binding was due to the 1:1 nature of amidine groups in the 1, 4, 5, 6-tetrahydropyrimidine [174]. These findings could pave the way for the use of carbon dioxide capture technologies via amidine systems [175].…”
Section: Geological Storage Of Comentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings were also confirmed by Seckin et al [177]; the authors used 1, 4, 5, 6-tetrahydropyrimidine polymer compound to capture CO 2 and concluded that this method was more feasible compared to other CO 2 capture methods. The effectiveness of CO 2 binding was due to the 1:1 nature of amidine groups in the 1, 4, 5, 6-tetrahydropyrimidine [174]. These findings could pave the way for the use of carbon dioxide capture technologies via amidine systems [175].…”
Section: Geological Storage Of Comentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It was indicated that activated carbon and polymer-based adsorbents are the best type of physical adsorbents to be used for CO 2 capture. They produce about a 75%-80% pure CO 2 stream at a recovery of 90% [174]. Adsorption systems do not use high energy, and the recovery is far less than the chemical absorption methods [175].…”
Section: Geological Storage Of Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steam extraction leads to a substantial power reduction in the steam cycle. Other sources of power reduction are the exhaust gas fans, solvent circulation pumps, and CO2 compression up to a pressure suitable for transport and storage, CO2 removal and pumping [4,[13][14]. Significant R&D projects are dedicated to both the research of less expensive solvents as well as the development of more efficient capture and compression processes [15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies, however, have shown that CO2 capture from power plants is both very capital-and energyintensive [2][3][4][5]. For an example, integration of a postcombustion CO2 removal system with a natural gas-fueled combined cycle (NGCC) reduces the net plant efficiency of [8][9][10][11] percentage points (at 90% overall CO2 capture) [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCS technique involves capturing waste CO 2 from large sources such as fossil fuel-powered electricity generation plants, transporting it to a storage site, and depositing it in underground sequestration sites (Liu et al, 2014;Tola and Pettinau, 2014). Commercial-scale transport of CO 2 uses tanks, ships, trains and pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%