This article offers a critical methodological reflection on how we undertook covert digital ethnographic research on Spanish young people and their use of online dating apps with a focus on the potential risk attached to using them. We were interested in showing how we approached the fieldwork, how we developed different research identities and how those identities were able to draw out raw data which reflected the risk attached to the online dating apps. While the project as a whole used a mixedmethods framework which also encompassed open-ended interviews and surveys, we provide a series of critical reflections attuned to digital ethnography. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to show how the methodological techniques cultivated 'identities' for our ethnographer that became effective in teasing out attitudes to risk and sexual exploration. We also hope that the paper can facilitate similar studies in the future, thus paving the way for other researchers. For this reason, we highlight the problems we encountered during the fieldwork and discuss the ethical issues related to this specific field.'Fieldwork is an exercise of multiple roles [...] it is in some ways a masquerade' (Velasco and de Rada 2006) This article offers a critical methodological reflection into how we undertook covert digital ethnographic research on Spanish young people and their use of online dating apps with a focus on the potential risk attached to using them. We are interested in showing how we approached the fieldwork, how we developed different research identities and how those identities were able to draw out raw data which reflected the risk attached to the online dating apps. We chose six dating apps commonly used by young people in Spain and undertook the study over the course of 12 months in 2018. Ethnographic studies on online dating apps are almost non-existent. Recent monographs focus instead on the role of the internet in dating (Daniels, Gregory and McMillan Cottom 2016; Smith and Duggan 2013), on men, masculinity and contemporary dating (Haywood 2018; Ryan 2016). In a similar vein, journal article authors tend to use theoretical approaches and/or quantitative surveys that focus on gender and identity (Clemens, Atkin and Krishnan 2015), online dating behavior