2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power flow methods used in AC distribution networks: An analysis of convergence and processing times in radial and meshed grid configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in Section 4 underscore significant achievements in computational efficiency within the mixed-integer nonlinear model. Notably, by replacing the Radiality Constraint proposed by [11] with a larger set of constraints, each involving fewer variables (15), we observed a marked improvement in computation time. This strategic adjustment reflects the benefit of this approach to represent radiality conditions, instead of the traditional method used in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results presented in Section 4 underscore significant achievements in computational efficiency within the mixed-integer nonlinear model. Notably, by replacing the Radiality Constraint proposed by [11] with a larger set of constraints, each involving fewer variables (15), we observed a marked improvement in computation time. This strategic adjustment reflects the benefit of this approach to represent radiality conditions, instead of the traditional method used in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…in the power triangle constraint leads to deviations in topological decisions. The error associated with using the set of Constraint ( 16) was quantified using Gauss-Seidel power flow analysis [15] and is detailed in Table 3 under the column "%ER". In the 133 bus system, the model shows a 3% discrepancy in power loss compared to those reported in the literature, despite achieving an optimality gap of 0%.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations