“…Recently, dynamic stiffness method (DSM) has gained increasingly intense attention from worldwide researchers due to its exclusively remarkable features compared to many analytical and/or numerical methods (Danial et al., 1996; Bercin and Langley, 1996; Kevorkian and Pascal, 2001; Casimir et al., 2005; Boscolo and Banerjee, 2011, 2012, 2014; Fazzolari, 2013, 2014; Tounsi et al., 2014; Kolarevic et al., 2015; Nefovska-Danilovic and Petronijevic, 2015; Ghorbel et al., 2015, 2016; Li et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2017), which has great potential to be a promising alternative in modeling the dynamics of stiffened structures. Compared to conventional numerical techniques such as the finite element method (FEM), the dynamic stiffness method has some well-recognized features, one of which lies in that fact that it can provide adequate accurate results even at high frequency, such as 20,000 Hz, with only minimum discretization requirements (Nefovska-Danilovic and Petronijevic, 2015).…”