Power decreases trust in social exchange

Abstract

How does lacking vs. possessing power in a social exchange affect people's trust in their exchange partner? An answer to this question has broad implications for a number of exchange settings in which dependence plays an important role. Here, we report on a series of experiments in which we manipulated participants' power position in terms of structural dependence and observed their trust perceptions and behaviors. Over a variety of different experimental paradigms and measures, we find that more powerful actors place less trust in others than less powerful actors do. Our results contradict predictions by rational actor models, which assume that low-power individuals are able to anticipate that a more powerful exchange partner will place little value on the relationship with them, thus tends to behave opportunistically, and consequently cannot be trusted. Conversely, our results support predictions by motivated cognition theory, which posits that lowpower individuals want their exchange partner to be trustworthy and then act according to that desire. Mediation analyses show that, consistent with the motivated cognition account, having low power increases individuals' hope and, in turn, their perceptions of their exchange partners' benevolence, which ultimately leads them to trust. trust | power | social exchange | dependence | hope

How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking

“…Studies have also used episodic recall of a past event in which the participant was powerful, powerless, or in a neutral (control) position (e.g., Galinsky et al 2003). Economic games that create resource inequalities (e.g., ultimatum and dictator) and negotiation tasks have contributed to the understanding of power (De Dreu & Van Kleef 2004, Kim et al 2005, Magee et al 2007, Schilke et al 2015. The various manipulations of power generally have similar effects.…”

“…Negotiators with power are less motivated to be accurate than their partners, asking more leading questions and fewer diagnostic questions (De Dreu & Van Kleef 2004). This is associated with decreased trust in others (Inesi et al 2012, Schilke et al 2015. Power also decreases the ability to take another's vantage point (Galinsky et al 2006).…”

Metabolic response to Parkinson’s disease recapitulated by the haploinsufficient phenotype of diploid yeast cells hemizygous for the adrenodoxin reductase gene

“…On a genetic basis, the role of the tyrosine pathway was particularly interesting in this context. Although mitochondrial iron metabolism 14 and many different types of oxidative stress response 62,63 are highly conserved across species, yeast lacks the tyrosine hydroxylase enzyme, which would catalyse the first step in the synthesis of catecholamines including dopamine and norepinephrine. The human tyrosine hydroxylase shares ca .…”

“…Mitochondria play a key role in iron supply and utilisation in eukaryotic systems involving processes that are regulated and coordinated by iron-sulphur protein biogenesis 13 . These roles of mitochondria regarding iron metabolism, and particularly the generation of iron-sulphur clusters, have been conserved across eukaryotes from yeast to humans 14 .…”

Microsociologies: Social Exchange, Trust, Justice, and Legitimacy

“…There are many other examples of recent research that has examined some relationship among exchange, trust, justice, and legitimacy (Gillham and Edwards 2011;Schilke et al 2015;Mazerolle et al 2013). One can see how broadly these four processes have been applied in recent years.…”