Power, Politics, and Paranoia 2014
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139565417.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Power corrupts” revisited: the role of construal of power as opportunity or responsibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many situations, people in authority positions sacrifice their interests to serve their groups (Hoogervorst et al 2012, Ratcliff & Vescio 2013. This is more pronounced in collectivistic cultures, which associate power with social responsibility (socialized power), whereas in individualistic cultures power is seen in terms of self-interested opportunities (personalized power; Torelli & Shavitt 2010; see also Sassenberg et al 2014). These findings are consistent with the notion that power facilitates the pursuit of salient goals, which can be linked to the predispositions of the person, cultural influences, or the situation.…”
Section: Wwwannualreviewsorg • How Power Affects People 369mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many situations, people in authority positions sacrifice their interests to serve their groups (Hoogervorst et al 2012, Ratcliff & Vescio 2013. This is more pronounced in collectivistic cultures, which associate power with social responsibility (socialized power), whereas in individualistic cultures power is seen in terms of self-interested opportunities (personalized power; Torelli & Shavitt 2010; see also Sassenberg et al 2014). These findings are consistent with the notion that power facilitates the pursuit of salient goals, which can be linked to the predispositions of the person, cultural influences, or the situation.…”
Section: Wwwannualreviewsorg • How Power Affects People 369mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When social power differences are present, this implies that people have asymmetrical control over each other's resources and outcomes (Fiske & Berdahl, 2006). However, those who have power can interpret and use this asymmetrical control in different ways, some of which may result in behaviors that favor powerless individuals, whereas others may favor other individuals with power (for an overview of different approaches to and the implications of power, see Sassenberg, Ellemers, Scheepers, & Scholl, 2014). As a result, it is very important for subordinates to pay close attention to the communications and actions of those in power, so as to interpret and anticipate how they are likely to invest the control they have.…”
Section: Contextual Cues To Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, possessing power should make people even more likely to underestimate the extent to which others feel compelled by social pressure, thereby leading them to overestimate the extent to which another person “could have done otherwise.” This makes power likely to obscure a person's awareness of the coerciveness of their own requests and suggestions, decreasing their own sense of responsibility for another person's questionable behavior. Indeed, as this line of theorizing would suggest, inducing an other‐focus in powerful individuals—essentially, intervening to counteract powerful people's hyper‐egocentrism—has been found to increase their willingness to take responsibility for others (Chen, Lee‐Chai, & Bargh, ; De Wit, Scheepers, Ellemers, Sassenberg, & Scholl, ; Gordon & Chen, ; Sassenberg, Ellemers, Scheepers, & Scholl, ; Scholl, Sassenberg, Scheepers, Ellemers, & de Wit, ; Scholl et al, ).…”
Section: The Effect Of Power On Beliefs About Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%