2020
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2020.2996368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Control in Cellular Massive MIMO With Varying User Activity: A Deep Learning Solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the SCA method often recalls the CVX tools to calculate the numerical solution which will cost huge runtime. In this article, motivated by the weighted MMSE strategy, 16,17 we propose a low‐complexity iterative algorithm to determine a local optimum to P1, where the solution to each iteration can be obtained in closed form. Prior to presenting the detailed algorithm, we give the following theorem which helps us to solve P1 efficiently.…”
Section: Sum‐rate Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, the SCA method often recalls the CVX tools to calculate the numerical solution which will cost huge runtime. In this article, motivated by the weighted MMSE strategy, 16,17 we propose a low‐complexity iterative algorithm to determine a local optimum to P1, where the solution to each iteration can be obtained in closed form. Prior to presenting the detailed algorithm, we give the following theorem which helps us to solve P1 efficiently.…”
Section: Sum‐rate Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to References 13‐15, we advocate sum‐rate as the main metric and propose an iterative power optimization algorithm to maximize the sum‐rate, which can compensate for the rate degradation caused by jamming. The weighted minimum mean square error (MMSE) methodology is introduced to obtain a local optimum in polynomial time, 16,17 which is a standard way for decomposing the sum‐rate maximization problem into several subproblems that can be determined sequentially. It should be mentioned that our power control algorithm is different from the sequential convex approximation (SCA) strategy in References 6,18 since our algorithm can determine the closed‐form solution to each iteration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning is capable of providing efficient solutions, given that the complicated design and training phases have been successful. In Paper D [40], we first formulate a joint data and pilot power control for maximizing the ergodic sum SE. The 1 Introduction non-convexity of this problem is overcome by proposing a new algorithm, inspired by the weighted minimum mean square error (MMSE) approach, which finds a stationary point with polynomial complexity instead of seeking the global optimum with exponential computational complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the main difference between the current work and the work in [27]; (ii) The authors in [27] consider a cellular massive MIMO system, while here we consider a cell-free massive MIMO system. Note that unlike [27], having pure LSF components (i.e., the coefficients defined in (1)) as a raw input of the DCNN does not work in cell-free massive MIMO, and the network cannot learn the power elements obtained through the convex optimization approach. Hence, we generate a novel and unique input matrix to feed as the input to the DCNN for each ZF and MRC receiver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are three important differences between the proposed DCNN-based algorithm in this paper and the scheme presented in [27], which are: (i) In [27], the authors propose to use a deep learning approach to solve an optimization problem which could be solved through the standard convex optimization software. However, the main contribution of our work is finding an unrevealed mapping between the LSF components and the power elements obtained using the quantized version of the estimated channel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%