Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016 International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iswcs.2016.7600903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power consumption of Wi-Fi transceivers

Abstract: In this paper, the physical layer of the Wi-Fi IEEE 802.11ac standard is analyzed from the energy efficiency point of view. To better assess the energy footprint of Wi-Fi communications, the power dissipated in the circuits to run the signal processing algorithms is taken into account in addition to the classical transmission power at the antenna. Simulations and hardware developments on a Field-Programmable Gate Array board provide a reliable evaluation of the power distribution between transmitter and receiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that the high throughput in TS and PS receivers is made possible by the large power consumption at the ID. Several hundreds of mW of power are consumed for decoding those OFDM WiFi-like information signals at TS and PS receivers [78]. Additional power consumption for acquiring CSIT is required for the superimposed OFDM-SMF signal.…”
Section: B Prototypes and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that the high throughput in TS and PS receivers is made possible by the large power consumption at the ID. Several hundreds of mW of power are consumed for decoding those OFDM WiFi-like information signals at TS and PS receivers [78]. Additional power consumption for acquiring CSIT is required for the superimposed OFDM-SMF signal.…”
Section: B Prototypes and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other conditions include system complexity for system feasibility, spectrum efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) for efficient use of available bandwidth and energy as discussed in [12]. Since the CE-FrFT-OFDM uses FrFT in its operation with the same complexity and power consumption as FFT in a traditional OFDM [13], then, the CE-FrFT-OFDM has the same complexity and power consumption as the conventional OFDM with the exception of signal extension and its wrapping into CE. The fact that the additional operations in the CE-FrFT-OFDM are in the real-valued signal reduces extra memory requirement and power consumptions [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%