2008 International Conference on Reconfigurable Computing and FPGAs 2008
DOI: 10.1109/reconfig.2008.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Consumption Estimations vs Measurements for FPGA-Based Security Cores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As those numbers clearly demonstrate our FPGA-based system is more than 30 times faster than an Atom while its energy consumption is more than 90% lower. However, this comparison may not be extremely fair since for the Virtex-II we have actually measured the energy consumption while for the Atom we have estimated it using a certain tool; this may be slightly misleading since as it is demonstrated in [2] the power estimation are quite pessimistic (i.e. the reported energy consumption is higher than the actual one).…”
Section: Performance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As those numbers clearly demonstrate our FPGA-based system is more than 30 times faster than an Atom while its energy consumption is more than 90% lower. However, this comparison may not be extremely fair since for the Virtex-II we have actually measured the energy consumption while for the Atom we have estimated it using a certain tool; this may be slightly misleading since as it is demonstrated in [2] the power estimation are quite pessimistic (i.e. the reported energy consumption is higher than the actual one).…”
Section: Performance Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconfigurable hardware is considered more power hungry than low-power microcontrollers and therefore it has not been widely considered for WSN applications. However FPGAs allow for significantly higher performance and energy-efficient processing when implementing certain demanding networking tasks [2], [3]. Furthermore, since their functionality can be reprogrammed either prior to deployment or while in use, they are very promising candidates for general-purpose nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While deriving the DPCEM, DPC values of the FPGA for all the design variants are required in order to gather the initial data for model derivation. Software prediction tools like Xilinx Power Analyzer can be used for this purpose if accurate switching activity factors are available [64][65][66]. We have used the method of actual DPC measurement to maximize the accuracy of the model derivation process.…”
Section: Power Consumption Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper in [11] presents several differences between measured and estimated power consumption, which varied from 15.52% to 208% for the Xilinx devices (Virtex II-Pro, and Spartan 3), and from 5.64% to 32.15% for the Altera device (Cyclone II).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%