2011
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran–Armitage test for trend

Abstract: The power of a chi-square test, and thus the required sample size, are a function of the noncentrality parameter that can be obtained as the limiting expectation of the test statistic under an alternative hypothesis specification. Herein, we apply this principle to derive simple expressions for two tests that are commonly applied to discrete ordinal data. The Wilcoxon rank sum test for the equality of distributions in two groups is algebraically equivalent to the Mann-Whitney test. The Kruskal-Wallis test appl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trends were examined with the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. 20 Baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups were compared using Pearson's Chi square test for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict factors that were associated with the administration of RT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trends were examined with the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. 20 Baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups were compared using Pearson's Chi square test for categorical variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict factors that were associated with the administration of RT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For interval data, the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test or the Mann–Whitney U test was used. We used the Cochran–Armitage test for trend21 to order the effects of age on utilisation of ED resources and to asses if it varied linearly as a function of age group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant heterogeneity was defined when P < 0.1 or I 2 > 50% [21, 22]. Consequently, a random effects model was selected; otherwise, a fixed effects model was applied [23, 24]. In addition, if significant heterogeneity was observed, subgroup analysis was performed to explore the possible sources of heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%