Power and Action in Critical Theory Across Disciplines: Implications for Critical Community Psychology

Abstract

Although critical scholarship and community psychology share similar aspirations, the links between them remain unexplored and under-theorized. In this article we explore the implications of critical scholarship in various specialties for the field of community psychology. To understand the contributions of critical scholarship to a theory of power and action for social change, we conducted a systematic analysis of a ten-year period of publications in seven journals associated with the critical scholarship tradition. We created precise criteria for the concepts of power and action and applied them to the publications. Results indicate an interesting paradox at play. Whereas community psychology is more action oriented than critical scholarship, its actions fall short of challenging institutionalized power structures and the status quo; and whereas critical scholarship is more challenging of the status quo than community psychology in theory, it has failed to produce viable actions that challenge the status quo. We discuss the implications of this state of affairs for the development of a more critical community psychology.

Exploring facilitation skills in transdisciplinary teamwork

“…This view is supported by various authors and specific reference is made to the following settings which are conducive to the discipline 260 of community psychology, namely: educational settings such as colleges, universities and schools, as well as prisons, and preventative intervention organisations such as early childhood development centres (Davidson et al, 2006;Ross and Deverell, 2004;Specter and Zax, 1974).…”

Deconstructing hierarchies: Service users as co-teachers in occupational therapy education

“…Disability Studies promote a shift from emphasizing the prevention/treatment/remediation paradigm to an increasing recognition and incorporation of the social/cultural/political paradigm [8]. This view describes the social components of disability and demonstrates how social structures may oppress and discriminate against people with disabilities even when presented as client-centered [9].…”

Aportes y reflexiones de la formación en psicología comunitaria PUCP en tres regiones del Perú

“…Esto implica desarrollar no solo un aspecto teórico sino práctico, en el cual se deben ampliar los abordajes y recurrir a otras disciplinas porque la complejidad de nuestra realidad plantea retos y necesidades que no se pueden abarcar desde una sola mirada por lo que el diálogo interdisciplinario es fundamental (Ansión, 2016). Se requiere integrar el conocimiento científico o académico al conocimiento tradi cional -también llamado saberes otros- (Balcázar, 2004;Davidson et al, 2006).…”