2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2008.493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Allocation and Subcarrier Pairing in OFDM-Based Relaying Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two ways of pairing lead to the following two sets of disjoint paths from the source to the destination: {P (1) i } = { (1, 1, c(3, 1)), (2, 2, c(3, 2))} and {P (2) i } = { (1, 2, c(3, 1)), (2, 1, c(3, 2))}, where the superscript j in {P (j) i } indicates a different set of path selection. By considering the equivalent channels from the source to the second relay, using the existing optimality result for dual-hop relaying [8], it is easy to see that c(3, 1) = 1 and c(3, 2) = 2 are optimal for {P (1) i }. Furthermore, we only need to show log 2 1 + γ SD (P (1) 1 ) + log 2 1 + γ SD P (1) 2 ≥ log 2 1 + γ SD P (2)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These two ways of pairing lead to the following two sets of disjoint paths from the source to the destination: {P (1) i } = { (1, 1, c(3, 1)), (2, 2, c(3, 2))} and {P (2) i } = { (1, 2, c(3, 1)), (2, 1, c(3, 2))}, where the superscript j in {P (j) i } indicates a different set of path selection. By considering the equivalent channels from the source to the second relay, using the existing optimality result for dual-hop relaying [8], it is easy to see that c(3, 1) = 1 and c(3, 2) = 2 are optimal for {P (1) i }. Furthermore, we only need to show log 2 1 + γ SD (P (1) 1 ) + log 2 1 + γ SD P (1) 2 ≥ log 2 1 + γ SD P (2)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of the direct source-destination link, for the practical case of noisy-relay, by using the property of L-superadditivity of the rate function, the authors of [7] proved that the sorted-SNR CP still remains optimal for sum-rate maximization in dual-hop AF relaying OFDM system. Subsequently, it was further proved in [8], through a different approach, that the sorted-SNR CP scheme is optimal for both AF and DF relaying in the same setup. When the direct sourcedestination link is available, [9] presented two suboptimal CP schemes.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the above gradient, the updates according to (26) will not be undone if the objective becomes worse after an update. Thus, the implemented algorithm has to keep track of the best achieved sum rate and corresponding resource allocations:…”
Section: Subgradient Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…initialise allocation elements according to (30), (31), (32) repeat for all resource allocation vectors x do calculate partial derivatives according to (27) repeat apply feasibility updates (28) and (29) until update direction is feasible update allocation elements according to (26) …”
Section: Algorithm 1 Gradient Descent Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation