2012
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2012.2183192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Allocation and Spectrum Sharing in Multi-User, Multi-Channel Systems With Strategic Users

Abstract: We consider the decentralized power allocation and spectrum sharing problem in multi-user, multichannel systems with strategic users. We present a mechanism/game form that has the following desirable features. (1) It is individually rational. (2) It is budget balanced at every Nash equilibrium of the game induced by the game form as well as off equilibrium. (3) The allocation corresponding to every Nash equilibrium (NE) of the game induced by the mechanism is a Lindahl allocation, that is, a weakly Pareto opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, practical suboptimal methods need to be developed to perform resource allocations. In [12], the authors propose a game theoretic approach for the joint spectrum sharing and power allocation problem in non-cellular multi-user multi-channel systems, where users directly communicate with one another. The spectrum and power assignments in [13] are jointly determined according to secondary users' requirements in cognitive radio networks, which however cannot be directly applied to cellular networks either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, practical suboptimal methods need to be developed to perform resource allocations. In [12], the authors propose a game theoretic approach for the joint spectrum sharing and power allocation problem in non-cellular multi-user multi-channel systems, where users directly communicate with one another. The spectrum and power assignments in [13] are jointly determined according to secondary users' requirements in cognitive radio networks, which however cannot be directly applied to cellular networks either.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19]), power allocation and spectrum sharing problem (e.g. [18]), networked public good [20], networked private good [21]. Sinha et al studied a relatively more general setting in [22], which is also a subclass of the problem that we study in this work.…”
Section: B Mechanism Design For the Num Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we consider the fog-based user-provided network (UPN) as a concrete example of the DeNUM framework, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the DeNUM Mechanism, the DeNUM Algorithm, and the DyDeNUM Mechanism. Such 18 The relative error is defined as…”
Section: Application: Fog-based User-provided Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations