2001
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.70.617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Power Absorption Calculation for Electron Cyclotron Resonance Heating in H-1 Heliac

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once it enters the plasma, the differential equations are numerically solved using the dispersion relation (4) by the Hamming method. This calculation method is the same as a ray tracing code for the H-1 heliac device [11]. When the ray reaches the O-mode cut-off layer with optimal angle, it is converted into the X-mode propagating inside the cut-off layer.…”
Section: Ray Tracing Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once it enters the plasma, the differential equations are numerically solved using the dispersion relation (4) by the Hamming method. This calculation method is the same as a ray tracing code for the H-1 heliac device [11]. When the ray reaches the O-mode cut-off layer with optimal angle, it is converted into the X-mode propagating inside the cut-off layer.…”
Section: Ray Tracing Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to gain the radius and thickness of the resonance layer, the interaction between ECW and HL-2A plasma has been simulated using TORAY ray-tracing code. 39 The calculated results show that r EC = 0.015 m and ⌬ EC = 0.015 m. It follows that the power of ECW is deposited in the plasma center and the resonance layer is very thin. According to these parameters and Eq.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Theoretical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Incidentally, in the theoretical simulations of the fusion plasma, one should specify the beam profile for the beam absorption power, which has the inherent limitations to describe the complex events. Therefore, we end up with a simplified method model as a Gaussian beam profile [16,17,30,31].…”
Section: Power Deposition Profiles Near Ecr Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%