1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-5562-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powder Surface Area and Porosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
340
2
34

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
340
2
34
Order By: Relevance
“…The adsorbent capacity and the intensity of adsorption can be measured from the values of the intercept (lna) and the slope (1/b) in the Freundlich isotherm (Lowell and Shields 1991). In the present study, it was found that the sorption capacity of the adsorbent decreased with an increase in temperature (Table 3), which accounts for the reduced monolayer moisture values at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The adsorbent capacity and the intensity of adsorption can be measured from the values of the intercept (lna) and the slope (1/b) in the Freundlich isotherm (Lowell and Shields 1991). In the present study, it was found that the sorption capacity of the adsorbent decreased with an increase in temperature (Table 3), which accounts for the reduced monolayer moisture values at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The nitrogen adsorption isotherm of an aluminum-coated quartz crystal microbalance shows that the aluminum surface has no significant porosity. 41 An analysis of the nitrogen isotherm of three different samples based on the BET-method gave a surface roughness of 1.12 cm2/cm2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ar sorption isotherms collected at liquid nitrogen temperature (-196 o C) were analyzed using Brunauer, Emmet, Teller (BET) equation and non-local density functional theory (NLDFT) [33][34][35][36][37][38] to reveal the SSA and pore-size distributions (PSD) of CDC. Quantachrome's data reduction software Autosorb v.1.27 [ 3 1 ] was employed for these calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%