2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Powder bed charging during electron-beam additive manufacturing

Abstract: a b s t r a c tElectrons injected into the build envelope during powder bed electron-beam additive manufacturing can accumulate on the irradiated particles and cause them to repel each other. Under certain conditions, these electrostatic forces can grow so large that they drive the particles out of the build envelope in a process known as "smoking". In the present work, we investigate the causes of powder bed charging and smoking during electron-beam additive manufacturing. In the first part of the paper, we c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 However, this very innovative tool still cannot completely solve the problems of the limited range of printable materials and extremely expensive equipment that have existed for a long time. 7 To avoid these problems, a low-cost 3D printing technique via metal paste injection 3D printing was developed. It involves the use of the material deposition principle for forming a 3D shape layer-by-layer, similar to the fused deposition modeling (FDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 However, this very innovative tool still cannot completely solve the problems of the limited range of printable materials and extremely expensive equipment that have existed for a long time. 7 To avoid these problems, a low-cost 3D printing technique via metal paste injection 3D printing was developed. It involves the use of the material deposition principle for forming a 3D shape layer-by-layer, similar to the fused deposition modeling (FDM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may have a negative effect on the sintering behavior which may lead to an increased risk of ''powder smoking'' (ejection of powder from the powder bed), with the formation of LOFDs in the subsequent layer as a result. [1,31] As shown in Figure 10, the oxygen level in the powder is consistently higher than that in the bulk material of the solid samples, which means that there is a net release of oxide from the bulk material during the EBM build process. The reason for this may be twofold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The combination of parameters in the preheat step (e.g., line order, line offset, beam focus and beam speed) are tailored in such a way to add sufficient heat to the system to raise the temperature of the surface of the powder bed, while also allowing sufficient time for charge to dissipate between line scans until the powder is sintered. Only recently has work by Cordero et al modeled these charge and heating/sintering effects for a mono layer of spherical metallic powder with an oxide layer during preheating [31]. However, the local variations in particle size distribution, morphology oxide thickness in typical AM powders significantly complicate the prediction of the onset of scattering and require further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The somewhat high observed sintering temperature of the alnico powders (~1100 • C) is relatively close to the melting temperature of the material (~1257 • C), leading to difficulty in maintaining a consistent heat flux through the build chamber without over-sintering the powders during preheating. Surface temperatures below~900 • C were observed to be susceptible to charge induced powder scattering events (i.e., "smoking" [29][30][31]), one cause of premature failure of these runs. On the other hand, over-sintering would cause the entire layer to curl and separate from the powder bed, and the resulting vacuum gap breaks the conductive pathway and exacerbates the effect.…”
Section: Process Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%