Poverty effects of public health reforms in Turkey: A focus on out‐of‐pocket payments

Abstract

Rationale, aims, and objectives Expanded financial coverage is critical to fight against poverty through public health reforms in developing countries. This study explores inequity in public health financing reforms in Turkey between 2003 and 2015. Methods This paper has two parts. The first part examines inequity in health care financing in Turkey between 2003 and 2015. Gini, entropy (Theil and mean logarithmic deviation), and Atkinson indexes were calculated. In the second part of the paper, we investigated the degree of progressivity by using Kakwani index and Lorenz and concentration curves. Results We found a decreasing trend in terms of inequity. After major public health reforms and unification of the health financing system, it is seen that the distribution of out‐of‐pocket expenditure on health stands on the shoulders of vulnerable groups. Conclusions Study results provide a deep understanding of the effects of poverty on public health financing reforms on households in Turkey. To reduce out‐of‐pocket health spending inequities and to protect vulnerable groups from increasing the level of health expenditures, we suggest that the government enlarges health insurance coverage for the poor.

Group problem management plus (PM+) to decrease psychological distress among Syrian refugees in Turkey: a pilot randomised controlled trial

“…No significant differences in health system costs or in productivity losses between the two groups were found; and a longer term follow up in a fully powered trial is needed to assess improvements in mental health status and determine whether mental health gains achieved, with costs of delivering gPM+ of approximately 380 TL per participant, are potentially cost effective. It is also important to recognise the complexity of the health system in Turkey, even after major reforms which have consolidated several insurance funds into one public insurance system and ensured free of point access to primary care [ 47 ]; further data collected using the CSRI also indicates that some refugees still incur additional out of pocket costs for privately funded services. For example, 5 study participants (11%) had out of pocket costs of up to 220 Turkish Lira per community doctor consultation.…”

The association of social inequality with the onset and persistence of psychotic experiences and progression along the extended psychosis phenotype: A six-year follow-up study in a community-based sample

“…In Turkey, there are four different systems of health insurance, but in the case of poverty, rural background, and unemployment, the risk of having no social insurance increases [34]. Although the possession of health insurance changes from society to society, under the circumstances of modern society, having no social insurance only means accumulated psychosocial risk factors [35]. In our paper, having no social insurance was associated with the persistence and progression of PEs, which may indicate a higher risk of psychosocial risk factors.…”

Equity in Out-of-Pocket Payments for Healthcare Service Delivery in Urban and Rural Households: Evidence from Iran

“…To confirm this claim, a study was conducted in Turkey to evaluate the distribution of inequality in healthcare financing in different deciles of the community using the relevant indicators. According to the obtained results, the distribution of direct out-of-pocket payment placed more pressure on vulnerable community groups (15). In India, those living in urban slums and rural households receive more direct out-of-pocket payments compared to other community groups while receiving healthcare services (16).…”