Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-750x(00)00075-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poverty Comparisons Over Time and Across Countries in Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
250
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
250
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One factor with eigenvalue greater than 1 was extracted explaining 94% of the total variation. Given that all the included variables are closely related to households' wealth status, the first factor explaining 94% of the total variation is assumed to be our measure of wealth (McKenzie, 2005;Sahn & Stifel, 2000). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy is 0.7 and Bartlett's test of sphericity has a value of 538.575 (df = 66, P < .000) indicating that the model fit is appropriate.…”
Section: Wealth and Poverty Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One factor with eigenvalue greater than 1 was extracted explaining 94% of the total variation. Given that all the included variables are closely related to households' wealth status, the first factor explaining 94% of the total variation is assumed to be our measure of wealth (McKenzie, 2005;Sahn & Stifel, 2000). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy is 0.7 and Bartlett's test of sphericity has a value of 538.575 (df = 66, P < .000) indicating that the model fit is appropriate.…”
Section: Wealth and Poverty Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Households who are below the 40 th percentile of the wealth index are categorized as poor and all others as non-poor. Sahn & Stifel (2000) and Fisher & Kandiwa (2014) also applied the asset poverty approach and used the 40 th percentile as a cut off-point for poverty categories. The descriptive statistics for the social network variables as well as the other control variables included in the econometric model are provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Wealth and Poverty Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Socio-economic stratification of the standard of living The first step is to estimate an indicator of wealth for each household based on the weighted sum of various indicators of well-being [11]- [14]. Let's i X be the wealth indicator for the household i, ij x owned in basics needs j and by j α the weight of each basic need, the expression of i X is:…”
Section: ) Critical Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Meulman'sworks [16], one use non-linear principal component analysis with optimal encoding [4] [5]. Some researchers prefer confirmatory analysis [14], because this method can be satisfied by a limited number of common factors. In the goal of reducing the arbitrariness in the choice of the method of data reduction, two approaches are used in recent times.…”
Section: ) Critical Assetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the number of household consumer durable assets, the more durables household assets the individual has. Ownership of these listed household consumer durable assets has consistently been used to demonstrate one's wealth and/or SES creation (Kruk et al, 2008;Sahn and Stifel, 2000).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%