2019
DOI: 10.1080/0376835x.2019.1666703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poverty and inequality in South Africa: critical reflections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ancestry and socio-economic status (SES) are expected to be significant determinants of CF-related outcomes in SA, which is reported to be one of the most unequal societies in the world. 14 South Africa launched its CF registry in 2018 and adopted similar data collection methods as the 2017 European CF registry 15 . South Africa is categorised by the Word Bank as a high-middle income country and has a population of nearly 60 million 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ancestry and socio-economic status (SES) are expected to be significant determinants of CF-related outcomes in SA, which is reported to be one of the most unequal societies in the world. 14 South Africa launched its CF registry in 2018 and adopted similar data collection methods as the 2017 European CF registry 15 . South Africa is categorised by the Word Bank as a high-middle income country and has a population of nearly 60 million 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The likely reason for this could be that the Apartheid policies afforded Coloured, White and Indian/ Asian sub-population groups more socio economic benefits in terms of housing, education and general wellbeing [31] . The socio-economic inequalities in South Africa are often visible across racial lines due to the historical legacies of legalized racial segregation [31][32][33]. When comparing employment status, this study found significant differences between the five employment categories for all three isolation scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The odds of being prepared to self-isolate, or to separate children and the elderly from the rest of the family were higher among other race groups when compared to Black Africans. The likely reason for this could be that the Apartheid policies afforded Coloured, White and Indian/Asian sub-population groups more socio economic benefits in terms of housing, education and general wellbeing [ 31 ] . The socio-economic inequalities in South Africa are often visible across racial lines due to the historical legacies of legalized racial segregation [ 31 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a Gini coefficient of 0.63 — a score which reflects the fact that the richest 10 per cent hold 71 per cent of all wealth and earn two‐thirds of all national income — it is also the most unequal country in the world (see Alvaredo et al., 2018; Scott, 2019; see also StatsSA, 2019b). In other words, important as social grants may be, the South African welfare regime is not one that is capable of addressing ‘the way power produces and reproduces the conditions that facilitate growing inequality’ (Francis and Webster, 2019: 789). What is more, as I argue in my concluding remarks, even in the expanded form of a universal basic income that Ferguson advocates, cash transfers are unlikely to do much to fundamentally address the root causes of the problem of poverty among surplus populations.…”
Section: Cash Transfers: a Welfare State By Any Other Name?mentioning
confidence: 99%