The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.4038/tar.v21i3.3306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poultry Offal Meal as a Substitute to Dietary Soybean Meal for Japanese Quails (<i>Coturnix coturnix japonica</i>): Assessing the maximum inclusion level and the Effect of Supplemental Enzymes

Abstract: The proximate composition, pepsin digestibility, gross energy and macro mineral contents of 12 composite samples of poultry offal meal produced in Sri Lanka were analyzed. The average dry matter, ash, crude protein, crude fiber, ether extract, in vitro pepsin digestibility and gross energy of poultry offal meal were 92.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples used in this study were dried soon after collection to forestall the commencement of the activities of the spoilage bacteria. The percent crude protein of POM in this study (51.31) is lower than 62.5 reported for broiler offal (Islam et al, 1994), 60.00 in chicken offal meal (Fanimo et al, 1996) and 56.00 in poultry visceral offal meal (Salami and Oyewole, 1997), but similar to 50.15 reported by Mutucumarana et al (2010). The reason for variation in the nutritive values of POM may be due to the variation in source and types of raw materials, storage time of raw materials prior to rendering and processing conditions (Najafabadi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Samples used in this study were dried soon after collection to forestall the commencement of the activities of the spoilage bacteria. The percent crude protein of POM in this study (51.31) is lower than 62.5 reported for broiler offal (Islam et al, 1994), 60.00 in chicken offal meal (Fanimo et al, 1996) and 56.00 in poultry visceral offal meal (Salami and Oyewole, 1997), but similar to 50.15 reported by Mutucumarana et al (2010). The reason for variation in the nutritive values of POM may be due to the variation in source and types of raw materials, storage time of raw materials prior to rendering and processing conditions (Najafabadi et al, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Sahir et al (2016) afirmam que a quantidade e a qualidade da proteína influenciam no desempenho das aves, bem como na eficácia de atuação das proteases exógenas adicionadas às dietas.Contudo, existem relatos da utilização de enzimas na melhoria do desempenho das aves alimentadas com dietas contendo FP e formuladas com adequados teores de proteína bruta e de aminoácidos. Mutucumarana et al (2010) observaram que a farinha mista de abatedouro de frangos pode ser usada em até 10% nas dietas, associadaà suplementação com complexo enzimático SSF e lipase, sem prejudicar o desempenho de codornas de corte até os 35 dias de idade.Já Mahmood et al (2018) observaram que a farinha mista de abatedouro de aves pode ser utilizada em até 3%,associada à suplementação de protease,sem prejudicar o desempenho e o rendimento de carcaça de frangos de corte aos 35 dias de idade.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Studies on laying hens (Senkoylu et al, 2005;Samli et al, 2006;Hosseinzadeh et al, 2010;Geshlog et al, 2011), broilers (Jafari et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2014;Mahmood et al, 2017;Ahmad et al, 2017), andquail (Erturk &Celik, 2004;Mutucumarana et al, 2010;Mutucumarana et al, 2011) tested the use of these products. These studies were related to egg production and quality and the effects of poultry meal on egg shelf-life, and sensory properties were not investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%