2017
DOI: 10.1364/jocn.9.000401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

POTORI: A Passive Optical Top-of-Rack Interconnect Architecture for Data Centers

Abstract: Abstract-Several optical interconnect architectures inside data centers (DCs) have been proposed to efficiently handle the rapidly growing traffic demand. However, not many works have tackled the interconnects at top-of-rack (ToR), which have a large impact on the performance of the data center networks (DCNs) and can introduce serious scalability limitations due to the high cost and power consumption. In this paper, we propose a passive optical ToR interconnect architecture (POTORI) to replace the conventiona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributed and centralized MAC protocol based heuristics have also been proposed to control optical switches. In the 64-port POTORI (coupler based) switch, a centralized and tailored MAC protocol uses Largest First (LF) and iSLIP scheduling heuristics, which were shown to incur a latency of 10 ms above 80% workload [14]. The c-MAC control scheme in the AWG-based petabit switch architecture has an estimated latency of 5 µs (also for 64-port AWG) for offered network loads above 70% [64].…”
Section: B Optical Scheduler Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distributed and centralized MAC protocol based heuristics have also been proposed to control optical switches. In the 64-port POTORI (coupler based) switch, a centralized and tailored MAC protocol uses Largest First (LF) and iSLIP scheduling heuristics, which were shown to incur a latency of 10 ms above 80% workload [14]. The c-MAC control scheme in the AWG-based petabit switch architecture has an estimated latency of 5 µs (also for 64-port AWG) for offered network loads above 70% [64].…”
Section: B Optical Scheduler Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a major challenge faced when scaling an optical switch is the scalability of the central scheduler [12]. Hence, many optical switch technologies resolve to softwarebased scheduling to simplify switch configuration [9], [10], [13], [14]. Nevertheless, software based control systems take milliseconds to compute switch configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scalability of wired OSA architecture is limited by the switch port radix, just supporting 2560 servers. POPI and POTORI DCN architectures can provide dynamic bandwidth to serve the various traffic [22,23]. However, the hundreds of microseconds server-to-server latency do not satisfy the latency-sensitive applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high cost and high-power consumption characteristics of traditional data centers introduce severe scalability limitations. A passive optical top-of-rack (ToR) interconnect architecture is proposed to replace the traditional electronic packet switch (EPS) in the data center networks (DCNs) access layer [16]- [18]. Meanwhile, an optical interconnection structure based on a fiber link is proposed to realize long-distance optical interconnection transmission [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%