1993
DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1993.1451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentiation of CYP1A1 Gene Expression in MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells Cotreated with 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin and 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol-13-Acetate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the Ah nonresponsiveness of Hs578T cells is not due to the failure of these cells to express the AhR and form a nuclear 6.9 S AhR complex or to interact with DREs. The results are in contrast to mutant benzo[a]pyrene-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells that also express the nuclear AhR but do not bind to a DRE (Moore et al, 1993). The failure of the AhR to form a DRE complex is consistent with the Ah non-responsiveness of the mutant MCF-7 cells; however, the results obtained with Hs578T cells indicate that other factors must be associated with the failure to observe an induction response with TCDD.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results suggest that the Ah nonresponsiveness of Hs578T cells is not due to the failure of these cells to express the AhR and form a nuclear 6.9 S AhR complex or to interact with DREs. The results are in contrast to mutant benzo[a]pyrene-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells that also express the nuclear AhR but do not bind to a DRE (Moore et al, 1993). The failure of the AhR to form a DRE complex is consistent with the Ah non-responsiveness of the mutant MCF-7 cells; however, the results obtained with Hs578T cells indicate that other factors must be associated with the failure to observe an induction response with TCDD.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Studies in this laboratory have focused on determining the regulation of Ah responsiveness in human breast cancer cell lines using induction of CYPlAI and inhibition of oestrogeninduced gene expression as models (Harris et al, 1989;Arellano et al, 1993;Moore et al, 1993;Wang et al, 1993;Thomsen et al, 1994;Chaloupka et al, 1995). Several reports suggest that induction of CYPlAI in human breast cancer cells by AhR agonists requires a functional ER (Jaiswal et al, 1985;Ivy et al, 1988;Pasanen et al, 1988;Harris et al, 1989;Thomsen et al, 1991Thomsen et al, ,1994.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was first observed by Nebert et al (20) almost 30 years ago, when reduced cytochrome P450-catalyzed aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase activity in both animals and cultured cells was observed after exposure to 17␤-estradiol. This observation has appeared periodically in the literature, but no mechanism has unequivocally defined the effect (21)(22)(23)(24)(25).…”
Section: Tcddmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, after 12 hours the activity recovers by reaching 78% of value of the control (MC treated, time 0) and remains constant up to 24 hours. The biphasic effect of TPA on MC-induced CYP1A, was already demonstrated by Moore et al [58] who found that TPA causes a time and concentration-dependent modulation of TCDD-induced CYP1A1 gene expression in MCF-7 cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These observations are consistent with many studies in the last decade which have reported the modulation mediated by PKC of CYP1A1 activity and expression in many cell types and tissues. A various number of data and papers on in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that serine/threonine kinase PKC plays an important role in the regulation of AhR signal transduction pathway [14,15,23,25,58,59].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%