2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(03)00297-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentials of mean force with ab initio mixed Hamiltonian models of solvation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in an alternative approach the entire or at least parts of the solvent are treated with a lower level of theory than the solute, for example, by molecular mechanics. [24,25,[27][28][29] Within these methods, known as QM/MM, the solvent-solvent and solute-solvent interactions are mostly given by a sum of electrostatic and van der Waals contributions. While the van der Waals interactions are often evaluated by Lennard-Jones-type potential functions, [27,28,30] an appropriate handling of the electrostatic interactions between solute and solvent, which couples the quantum-mechanically treated solute with the molecular-mechanically treated solvent, is important.…”
Section: Solvationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in an alternative approach the entire or at least parts of the solvent are treated with a lower level of theory than the solute, for example, by molecular mechanics. [24,25,[27][28][29] Within these methods, known as QM/MM, the solvent-solvent and solute-solvent interactions are mostly given by a sum of electrostatic and van der Waals contributions. While the van der Waals interactions are often evaluated by Lennard-Jones-type potential functions, [27,28,30] an appropriate handling of the electrostatic interactions between solute and solvent, which couples the quantum-mechanically treated solute with the molecular-mechanically treated solvent, is important.…”
Section: Solvationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….i (i) denotes the ensemble average of the difference in total QM/MM energies E i and E j of the system with solute in the i and j configurations respectively, and with the solvent molecules in configurations originating from a Monte Carlo random walk based on the energy of solute in the i configuration. We adopted the double perturbation approach of Dupuis et al 15 In this approach an intermediate MM/MM level of theory is used for the random walk, with the solute subsystem treated at the MM level of theory, with the same Lennard-Jones parameters as those used in the QM/MM model 16 and with atomic partial charges extracted from a fit to the electrostatic potential of the solute in the gas phase (CHELPG (charges from electrostatic potentials using a grid-based method) charges). 17 In the present work, for each solute configuration i, 20 000 000 solvent configurations were generated at the MM/MM level of theory, at constant temperature T = 298 K and constant volume (NVT ensemble).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….i ðiÞ denotes the ensemble average of the difference in total QM/MM energies of gly-1W (in structures i and j) with the solvent molecules in configurations originating from a Monte Carlo random walk around gly-1W in structure i in a solvation sphere with a radius of 9.32 ¡ (Figure 1B), in which the water density is 1 g cm ¹3 . To sample the solvent configurations, we adopted the double perturbation approach of Dupuis et al 18 In this approach, an intermediate MM/MM level of theory is used for the random walk, with the gly-1W subsystem treated at the MM level of theory, using the same LennardJones parameters as in the QM/ MM model and with atomic partial charges extracted from a fit to the electrostatic potential of the solute in the gas phase (CHELPG charges). 19 In the present work, for each gly-1W structure i along the selected IRC points, 20000000 solvent configurations were generated at the MM/MM level of theory, at a constant temperature T = 298 K and constant volume (NVT ensemble), of which 2000 configurations were selected randomly to be used for QM/ MM calculations.…”
Section: þ=Kt Gi ðIþ ð2þmentioning
confidence: 99%