1970
DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.219.1.178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentials in frog cornea and microelectrode artifact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments 0.1 M KC1 was chosen as a standard because of the small difference in the mobilities of the potassium and chloride ions, and because it is tolerated by the spherical cells. Also, the near-isotonicity of the solution was expected to minimize any matrix or "pre-tip" potential artifacts (Davis et al 1970;Nelson et al 1978). Table 4 summarizes the results of several simultaneous measurements with 0.1 M KC1 and a test electrolyte as well as similar measurements in which both electrodes (or barrels) were filled with identical solutions.…”
Section: Electrode Tip Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these experiments 0.1 M KC1 was chosen as a standard because of the small difference in the mobilities of the potassium and chloride ions, and because it is tolerated by the spherical cells. Also, the near-isotonicity of the solution was expected to minimize any matrix or "pre-tip" potential artifacts (Davis et al 1970;Nelson et al 1978). Table 4 summarizes the results of several simultaneous measurements with 0.1 M KC1 and a test electrolyte as well as similar measurements in which both electrodes (or barrels) were filled with identical solutions.…”
Section: Electrode Tip Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large cell volumes will act to buffer the effects of electrolyte leakage and, in impalements of plant cells (which generally result in penetration of the central vacuole), the tonoplast could provide a barrier between the cytoplasm and salt from the electrode tip. However, most animal cells are small, with volumes of 20 pl or less, and in several cases are known to be subject to salt leakage artifacts (Nelson et al, 1978, Davis et al, 1970. Comparably sized plant cells, such as stomatal guard cells, also occur, the tonoplast properties of which remain uncertain (Moody & Zeiger, 1978).…”
Section: Rt [_ J Rt"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the stroma was negative to the solution bathing both surfaces and suggested that the C1-transport mechanism was located in the endothelium. Controversial opinions regarding the stromal negative level are mentioned in literature [2,10,12,14]. Davis et al [10] using glass microelectrodes filled with 3 M KC1 or Ringer's solution suggested that the negative stromal potential could be a KC1 junction potential, being the consequence of the presence of negative fixed charges in the stroma, possibly due to existence of acidic polysaccharides in that region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is reinforced by the observation that leakage of KC1 from broken microelectrodes into the external solution induces a rapid disappearance of PDi, which is restored by repeated changes of the external solution. Therefore, based on the previous results, a working hypothesis, analogous to that formulated by Davis et al [10] to explain a potential level in the stroma of frog cornea, was put forward to account for the genesis of PDi. It was assumed that PDi is a KC1 d{ffusion potential generated by diffusion of this salt from the tip of the microelectrode into the matrix of the stratum corneum, where K ions would have a higher mobility than C1 ions (at the high pH used in the eXperiments), probably as a consequence of negative fixed charges in the matrix of the stratum corneum.…”
Section: Substitution Of Na By K In the External Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important reason for the genesis of large emf's at the level of the microelectrode tip is its location within a fixed-charge bearing matrix, as is the case of cells of the stratum corneum [15] or the stroma of connective tissue [5]. The electrical potentials observed with 3 M KC1 microelectrodes in the cells of the stratum corneum were interpreted as due to KC1 diffusion from the microelectrode into the fixed-charge bearing protein matrix with K § and CI-transference numbers controlled by the matrix degree of protonation [-10, 15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%