1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01808157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potentially prebiotic syntheses of condensed phosphates

Abstract: Abstract.In

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cyanoguanidine (a dimer of cyanamide) gave a 1.8% conversion to pyrophosphate in the presence of kaolinite, but only under acidic (pH<2) conditions and 0.1 M concentrations of both reactants (Steinman et al 1965). Condensing agents investigated by Keefe and Miller (1996) that were effective in the synthesis of pyrophosphate include maleic anhydride, pantoyl lactone and ammonium formate, but these are noteworthy for the use of high concentrations (0.25 M) and high temperatures (100°C) that render the syntheses implausible; of particular interest was a mixture of thiocyanate, hydrogen peroxide and phosphate, which gave efficient conversion to pyrophosphate under milder conditions, but as Keefe and Miller noted, the yields are too sensitive to the ratio of the reagents to regard it as "robust." Thioesters such as N, S-diacetylcysteamine are compelling because of their relevance to modern metabolism, but the prebiotic importance to the formation of pyrophosphate is diminished by the high concentrations: 0.1-0.2 M for the thioester, 0.2-0.4 M for the imidazole catalyst and 0.08-0.4 M for inorganic phosphate (Weber 1981(Weber , 1982.…”
Section: Relevance To Prebiotic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cyanoguanidine (a dimer of cyanamide) gave a 1.8% conversion to pyrophosphate in the presence of kaolinite, but only under acidic (pH<2) conditions and 0.1 M concentrations of both reactants (Steinman et al 1965). Condensing agents investigated by Keefe and Miller (1996) that were effective in the synthesis of pyrophosphate include maleic anhydride, pantoyl lactone and ammonium formate, but these are noteworthy for the use of high concentrations (0.25 M) and high temperatures (100°C) that render the syntheses implausible; of particular interest was a mixture of thiocyanate, hydrogen peroxide and phosphate, which gave efficient conversion to pyrophosphate under milder conditions, but as Keefe and Miller noted, the yields are too sensitive to the ratio of the reagents to regard it as "robust." Thioesters such as N, S-diacetylcysteamine are compelling because of their relevance to modern metabolism, but the prebiotic importance to the formation of pyrophosphate is diminished by the high concentrations: 0.1-0.2 M for the thioester, 0.2-0.4 M for the imidazole catalyst and 0.08-0.4 M for inorganic phosphate (Weber 1981(Weber , 1982.…”
Section: Relevance To Prebiotic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most models for prebiotic syntheses of condensed phosphates are characterized by low yields or forced conditions (Yamagata et al, 1991;Keefe and Miller, 1996): involving some combination of high temperatures (ϾϾ100 o C); abiological dehydrating agents; and/or drying cycles to increase polyphosphate yields, in contradistinction to reactions taking place at moderate temperatures in a fully aqueous environment. In addition, many of these syntheses have no counterpart in extant biochemistry and hence would present unwelcome discontinuities in the emergence of metabolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predecessors of the latter enzymes probably used oligophosphates, the presumed energy-rich phosphate compounds during prebiotic evolution (39,40), to phosphorylate early nucleotidelike molecules. This assumption is supported by the finding that, similar to HprK͞P, adenylate kinase also can use tripolyphosphate as phosphoryl donor (41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%