Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Among Older Persons: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract

PURPOSE Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is a common yet preventable medical error among older persons in primary care. It is uncertain whether PIP produces adverse outcomes in this population, however. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to pool the adverse outcomes of PIP specific to primary care. METHOD We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and previous review articles for studies related to "older persons," "primary care," and "inappropriate prescribing." Two reviewers selected eligible articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool studies with similar PIP criteria and outcome measures. RESULTS Of the 2,804 articles identified, we included 8 articles with a total of 77,624 participants. All included studies had cohort design and low risk of bias. Although PIP did not affect mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.05), it was significantly associated with the other available outcomes, including emergency room visits (RR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.32-2.00), adverse drug events (RR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.66), functional decline (RR 1.53; 95% CI, 1.08-2.18), health-related quality of life (standardized mean difference-0.26; 95% CI,-0.36 to-0.16), and hospitalizations (RR 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44). A majority of the pooled estimates had negligible heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis provides consolidated evidence on the wideranging impact of PIP among older persons in primary care. It highlights the need to identify PIP in primary care, calls for further research on PIP interventions in primary care, and points to the need to consider potential implications when deciding on the operational criteria of PIP.

Outcomes of Medication Misadventure Among People With Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“…Similar findings have been reported in 2 other meta-analyses conducted among the general elderly population. 21,69 Despite the methodological caveats intrinsic to such comparison, this would suggest that multiple factors such as poor health status, 69 comorbidities, 70 frailty and cognitive status 71 could serve as leading contributors to the risk of mortality among the users of PIMs. Notable heterogeneity was found between the included studies, and it is interesting to note that the heterogeneity was significantly decreased with stratification based on the institutionalized study setting (Table 2).…”

Effectiveness and organizational conditions of effectiveness of telemedicine in nursing homes. A study protocol of a comparative prospective cohort (EFFORT study)

“…More generally, 40% of NH residents are hospitalized at least once a year including emergency department transfers. 2 , 4 – 6 …”

Patient and provider perspectives on the development and resolution of prescribing cascades: a qualitative study

“…Problematic polypharmacy, defined here as using more medications than indicated or where potential harm outweighs benefit, increases people's risk for experiencing preventable adverse events [1][2][3]. Prescribing cascades are a type of problematic polypharmacy [4,5].…”