2014
DOI: 10.2217/fon.14.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Value of Rapid Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline in Identifying Primary Resistance to Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide

Abstract: RESULTS suggest the use of a simple and rapid method of identifying patients with primary resistance to NHAs: patients not achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in PSA levels within the first treatment month should undergo intensive investigations to verify whether they have primary resistance to NHAs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, PSA could be a valid clinical marker to minimize patient exposure to ineffective therapy. Other retrospective studies based on clinical experience such as the Caffo et al one (Caffo et al, 2014 ), aimed at identifying factors predicting primary resistance to new-generation hormonal agents. In this study, the role of these parameters was clearly demonstrated only in the cumulative analysis of patient treated with ENZ while in the AA group was not confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, PSA could be a valid clinical marker to minimize patient exposure to ineffective therapy. Other retrospective studies based on clinical experience such as the Caffo et al one (Caffo et al, 2014 ), aimed at identifying factors predicting primary resistance to new-generation hormonal agents. In this study, the role of these parameters was clearly demonstrated only in the cumulative analysis of patient treated with ENZ while in the AA group was not confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported strength of PSA decline and its predictive value for OS, although certain results were controversial [ 9 11 ]. Recently, Caffo et al reported the PSA kinetics of AA and enzalutamide responders and demonstrated different trends with regard to PSA kinetics between the drugs in chemotherapy-treated mCRPC patients [ 12 ]. However, patient number was limited, and PSA kinetics of chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients was not reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial Working Group (PCWG2) advises to ignore early PSA changes to avoid detecting continuing rise of PSA level and increasing in size before it regress [ 8 ]. However, some researchers reported early PSA decline, and its predictive value was possibly different by patient backgrounds and treatment [ 12 , 14 , 15 ]. In addition, the clinical practice in Japan, most of mCRPC patients are primary followed by monthly PSA testing, so, there is a potential of over use of early response as predictive factor for efficacy regardless the PCWG2 criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, differences in the use of tumour imaging methods are evident; while some patients received bone and/or CT scans multiple times during treatment, others did not receive a CT scan at all, and most decisions were based on the rise of PSA. However, this marker has its limitations [29], although, it has been shown that patients who do not achieve a ≥50% reduction in PSA levels within the first treatment month may have primary resistance to AA or E [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%