Potential Usefulness of Tracking Head Movement via a Wearable Device for Equilibrium Function Testing at Home

Abstract

Many studies have reported the use of wearable devices to acquire biological data for the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases. Balance dysfunction, however, is difficult to evaluate in real time because the equilibrium function is conventionally examined using a stabilometer installed on the ground. Here, we used a wearable accelerometer that measures head motion to evaluate balance and examined whether it performs comparably to a conventional stabilometer. We constructed a simplified physical head-feet model that simultaneously records “head” motion measured using an attached wearable accelerometer and center-of-gravity motion at the “feet”, which is measured using an attached stabilometer. Total trajectory length (r = 0.818, p -false discovery rate [FDR] = 0.004) and outer peripheral area (r = 0.691, p -FDR = 0.026) values measured using the wearable device and stabilometer were significantly positively correlated. Root mean square area values were not significantly correlated with wearable device stabilometry but were comparable. These results indicate that wearable, widely available, non-medical devices may be used to assess balance outside the hospital setting, and new approaches for testing balance function should be considered.

Investigation of Frequency-Selective Loudness Reduction and Its Recovery Method in Hearables

“…Hoshina et al investigated the effect of the active noise control (ANC) function on the output level from earphones in noisy environments and confirmed that it can mitigate the risk of hearing loss [15]. Yamanobe et al measured the balance function using earphones with a built-in accelerometer and identified a positive correlation with results using a stadiometer, indicating the usefulness of measuring balance with a non-medical device [16]. Ando et al.…”

Association between Locomotive Syndrome and Hearing Loss in Community-Dwelling Adults

“…The evaluated outcomes comprised the full distance of COP movement and the average squared area covered by COP shifts. Data were registered at a frequency of 100 Hz [18]. The metrics utilized included COP displacement per second and the encompassing area of the COP shift.…”