2005
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential use of visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for the estimation of nitrogen fractions in forages harvested from permanent meadows

Abstract: One-hundred and ninety-two herbage samples from permanent meadows located in the mountains of León (NW Spain) were analyzed for total nitrogen (total N), nitrogen in trichloroacetic acid precipitated matter (TCAN), borate-phosphate buffer insoluble nitrogen (BPBN), neutral-detergent insoluble nitrogen (NDIN) and acid-detergent insoluble nitrogen (ADIN). These data were used to calculate the partition of nitrogen fractions proposed by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS): A (total N − TCAN), … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration results for all constituents were similar to former studies dealing with dried samples of various crops, usually without ensiling or any pre-treatment. Cozzolino et al [10] reported RSQ cal of 0.91 and a RPD factor of 4.8 for the prediction of N, whereas Valdés et al [45] and Morón et al [25] obtained better RSQ values (0.97) and RPD factors (3.9 and 8.5, respectively). For the prediction of crude lipid Berardo et al [5] found satisfying results in dried pigeon peas with SEC of 2.5 and RSQ of 0.97, whereas DeBoever et al [12] reported poor calibration results in grass silages (accounted variance of 57.3 %, SEP of 5 g/kg and SD/SEP of 1.5).…”
Section: Prediction Accuracy For Solid Fuel Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calibration results for all constituents were similar to former studies dealing with dried samples of various crops, usually without ensiling or any pre-treatment. Cozzolino et al [10] reported RSQ cal of 0.91 and a RPD factor of 4.8 for the prediction of N, whereas Valdés et al [45] and Morón et al [25] obtained better RSQ values (0.97) and RPD factors (3.9 and 8.5, respectively). For the prediction of crude lipid Berardo et al [5] found satisfying results in dried pigeon peas with SEC of 2.5 and RSQ of 0.97, whereas DeBoever et al [12] reported poor calibration results in grass silages (accounted variance of 57.3 %, SEP of 5 g/kg and SD/SEP of 1.5).…”
Section: Prediction Accuracy For Solid Fuel Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is well known that total nitrogen (N), inorganic ash (ash), crude fibre (CF), ether extract (EE) and nitrogen free extracts (NFE) can be determined with NIRS (e.g. [32,45] as well as mineral compositions [38,33,16]. However, most studies concentrate on pure sample sets of wheat [25], maize silage [11,23], herbages, grass silages [30,2], legumes [19,9], rice [48] sunflower [26] or hemp [44].…”
Section: Focus Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A situation that arise when NIRS technology is used to predict N fractions in forages. Even though, total N is well predicted by NIRS, and NDIP also has an acceptable coefficient of determination (only when there is a strong correlation with total N), the protein B3 fraction it is not well predicted given by the accumulation of errors caused by the subtraction process (23) . A recommendation is to generate NIRS calibration equations by grass specie.…”
Section: Recibido 15/05/2017mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Foreign scholars have taken up research from 20 th century eighties [8,9]. In recent years, evolution about crop canopy and leaf reflection spectra and nitrogen content inversion was carried on research [10][11][12][13].Those research achieved preferable research findings. However, owing to the complexity of plant biochemistry characteristic hyperspectral response mechanism, it's a research hotspot in this field to find a more effective and sensitive diagnostic method all the times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%