1990
DOI: 10.1051/animres:19900107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential use of triticale in diets for rainbow trout: effects of dietary levels and incidence of cooking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…O CDa da energia bruta do FS para a truta, avaliado por Aksnes & Opstvedt (1998), foi de 56,00%, e para o TC avaliado por Gomes & Kaushik (1990), de 75,20%; estes resultados são inferiores aos obtidos no presente estudo, demonstrando que a tilápia do Nilo, por ser um peixe de hábito alimentar onívoro, apresenta melhor aproveitamento da energia de alimentos de origem vegetal quando comparada aos carnívoros.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O CDa da energia bruta do FS para a truta, avaliado por Aksnes & Opstvedt (1998), foi de 56,00%, e para o TC avaliado por Gomes & Kaushik (1990), de 75,20%; estes resultados são inferiores aos obtidos no presente estudo, demonstrando que a tilápia do Nilo, por ser um peixe de hábito alimentar onívoro, apresenta melhor aproveitamento da energia de alimentos de origem vegetal quando comparada aos carnívoros.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…O TG apresentou CDa da PB de 96,30%, valor este superior ao encontrado por Degani et al (1997b), para a farinha de trigo (91,26%) e superior ao encontrado para o triguilho por Hanley (1987) Hanley (1987) (83,26). O TC avaliado para a truta por Gomes & Kaushik (1990) apresentou CDa da PB inferior (84,80%). Com relação aos CDa da PB determinados, podemos verificar que geralmente a tilápia do Nilo, apresenta igual ou superior capacidade de aproveitamento dos alimentos avaliados, com relação aos resultados obtidos por diversos autores, com outras espécies, utilizados como base de comparação.…”
Section: 2 (%) (Kcal/kg) Respectivement (Values Express As Fed Basunclassified
“…Generally it has been observed that a partial substitution of fish meal by plant protein sources is well supported by fish, so currently more than 30% is already replaced in most commercial fish feeds (Teskeredzic at al., 1995;Forster et al, 1999;Burel et al, 2000;Vielma et al, 2000). Under conditions of partial replacement of fish meal, reasonably good growth performance has been observed with minor effects on metabolism (Gomes and Kaushik, 1990;Kaushik and Mambrini, 1994;Sanz et al, 1994;Carter and Hauler, 1995;Gomes et al, 1995;Robaina et al, 1995;Teskeredzic at al., 1995;Kissil et al, 2000;Refstie et al, 1997;Médale et al, 1998;Refstie et al, 2000). Fish meal free diets have also been used with success in some studies with rainbow trout (Kaushik et al, 1995;Watanabe et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substitution of fish meal by alternate protein sources has been the object of study since more than three decades (Fowler, 1980;Dorsa et al, 1982;Tacon et al, 1985;Smith et al, 1988), possibly reducing production costs but definitely having a beneficial impact on environmental loads, locally with regard to phosphorus discharge (Watanabe and Pongmaneerat, 1993;Ballestrazzi et al, 1994;Hardy, 1995;Burel et al, 1998;Riche and Brown, 1999;Barrias and Oliva-Teles, 2000) and globally over the preservation of wild fishery resources. In spite of the lower protein content, the deficiency in some indispensable amino acids (IAA) and the presence of anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) frequently found in most plant protein sources (Kaushik, 1990;Francis et al, 2001), many studies have demonstrated the possibility to incorporate such ingredients in feeds for salmonids (Gomes et al, 1993(Gomes et al, , 1995Oliva-Teles et al, 1994;Hardy, 1996;Forster et al, 1999;Refstie et al, 2000;Burel et al, 2000;Vielma et al, 2000). Generally it has been observed that a partial substitution of fish meal by plant protein sources is well supported by fish, so currently more than 30% is already replaced in most commercial fish feeds (Teskeredzic at al., 1995;Forster et al, 1999;Burel et al, 2000;Vielma et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%