2009
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2009002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential use of pine plantations to restore native forests in a highly fragmented river basin

Abstract: Abstract• In forests, the substitution of broadleaf species by conifers can reduce biodiversity because coniferous forests generally provide less diverse vascular understories than broadleaf forests. However, in some cases, former pine plantations might be useful for restoring native forests. We compared plant species composition on the plot scale in natural beech and mixed oak forests with that in plantations of Pinus radiata. Links between plant diversity and landscape parameters (patch size, fractal dimensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower diversity in plantations may also be due to the paucity of seed sources (Gonzales and Nakashizuka 2010) and by changes in decomposition rates and litter fall with plantation establishment (Barlow et al 2007b). In general, plantations contain a subset of primary forest species (FAO 2006), with lower levels of diversity and richness (Pomeroy and Dranzoa 1997;Fahy and Gormally 1998;Yirdaw 2001), but may be dependant upon adjacent or nearby forests for regeneration (Paritsis and Aizen 2008;Onaindia and Mitxelena 2009). As indicated by our results and discussed below, plantations (particularly young plantations) also tend to favor establishment of ruderal or exotic species over large, gravity dispersed or late seral species, leading to a change in species composition often not reflected in changes in overall species richness (Ito et al 2004;Paritsis and Aizen 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower diversity in plantations may also be due to the paucity of seed sources (Gonzales and Nakashizuka 2010) and by changes in decomposition rates and litter fall with plantation establishment (Barlow et al 2007b). In general, plantations contain a subset of primary forest species (FAO 2006), with lower levels of diversity and richness (Pomeroy and Dranzoa 1997;Fahy and Gormally 1998;Yirdaw 2001), but may be dependant upon adjacent or nearby forests for regeneration (Paritsis and Aizen 2008;Onaindia and Mitxelena 2009). As indicated by our results and discussed below, plantations (particularly young plantations) also tend to favor establishment of ruderal or exotic species over large, gravity dispersed or late seral species, leading to a change in species composition often not reflected in changes in overall species richness (Ito et al 2004;Paritsis and Aizen 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these Pinus reforestations may be an adequate intermediate stage in the recovery of the native vegetation in degraded and abandoned farmlands (Onaindia and Mitxelena, 2009). …”
Section: Edible Production and Marketed Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain native biodiversity, plant species either have to persist in phases of unsuitable conditions or mechanical disturbance in plantations or have to be able to re-colonize after local extirpation. Succession within plantations was often found to be positive for native species establishment and community restoration due to the promotion of natural habitat conditions with time [32][33][34][35]. Early phases, though, have been less studied even though they are considered to have the most severe effects on forest species that can determine further succession [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%