2019
DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.118.314653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Strategies for Clinical Translation of Repeated Cell Therapy

Abstract: Despite encouraging preclinical findings, clinical trials of repeated cell therapy are relatively scarce. As a result, the potential of this treatment paradigm remains to be assessed. We propose that a carefully planned clinical trial design using repeated cell dosing could lead to significant progress in the field of cell therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MSC infusions have been investigated as a treatment means for cardiac disease for more than a decade. Although accumulating evidence suggests that the MSC infusion can improve the cardiac function [ 34 ], however, information on the long-term dynamic outcomes of multiple hiPSC-MSC infusions on cardiac disease is unavailable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSC infusions have been investigated as a treatment means for cardiac disease for more than a decade. Although accumulating evidence suggests that the MSC infusion can improve the cardiac function [ 34 ], however, information on the long-term dynamic outcomes of multiple hiPSC-MSC infusions on cardiac disease is unavailable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After two decades of intensive research in the field of cell therapy for heart disease, conclusive demonstration of therapeutic efficacy of the cells is still lacking, and a fundamental understanding of how cell therapy works is still elusive[1, 3, 4, 29-31]. This has led to discussions of changes in the field and search for new paradigms for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite two decades of intensive research in cell therapy for heart disease, the optimal cell type, dosage, delivery method and frequency are still elusive, as is the mechanism behind the observed cardiac benefits of cell therapy[1, 2]. The available evidence supports two fundamental concepts: i) the majority of cell-related effects do not result from direct cardiomyocyte differentiation but rather from paracrine mechanisms[3], ii) all cells, regardless of cell type or delivery approach, fail to engraft in the heart to a significant extent[4]. Therefore, expecting a single administration of short-lasting cells to produce long-term benefits may be unrealistic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistently, in the CCTRN TIME (Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network Timing in Myocardial Infarction Evaluation) trial, administration of a higher percentage of CD45 + CD31 low bone marrow-derived single cells resulted in significantly reduced infarct size at 6 months after cell therapy. 11 Recently, several studies have reported that repeated injections of bone marrow-derived cells significantly improve LV function and long-term survival 12,13.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%