2008
DOI: 10.1080/01443410701532313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential stereotype threat and face validity effects on cognitive‐based test performance in the classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of modeling skill level as a moderator variable, studies have typically controlled for skill level in order to test whether the effect of stereotype threat is statistically significant beyond that of skill level or to increase the power to detect the effects of stereotype threat on performance (Steele & Aronson, 2004). Many studies examining the effect of the stereotype about women's math abilities have sampled those with relatively high SAT math scores (e.g., Martens, Johns, Greenberg, & Schimel, 2006;Marx & Roman, 2002;Quinn & Spencer, 2001;Schmader, 2002;Schmader & Johns, 2003;Shih, Pittinsky, & Ambady, 1999;Spencer et al, 1999) or have controlled for SAT math scores for these reasons (e.g., Gonzales, Blanton, & Williams, 2002;Hollis-Sawyer & Sawyer, 2008;Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev, 2000Keller, TESTING HYPOTHESIZED MODERATORS OF STEREOTYPE THREAT 2002, 2007Lesko & Corpus, 2006;Marx & Roman, 2002;Schmader, 2002;Schmader & Johns, 2003;Steele & Aronson, 1995;Vick, Seery, Blascovich, & Weisbuch, 2008;Wout, Danso, Jackson, & Spencer, 2008;Wout, Shih, Jackson, & Sellers, 2009). As Steele (1997) noted, it is those with greatest skill who are expected to suffer the most from stereotype threat, implying those with less skill in the domain will suffer less or not at all.…”
Section: Untested Predictions From Stereotype Threat Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of modeling skill level as a moderator variable, studies have typically controlled for skill level in order to test whether the effect of stereotype threat is statistically significant beyond that of skill level or to increase the power to detect the effects of stereotype threat on performance (Steele & Aronson, 2004). Many studies examining the effect of the stereotype about women's math abilities have sampled those with relatively high SAT math scores (e.g., Martens, Johns, Greenberg, & Schimel, 2006;Marx & Roman, 2002;Quinn & Spencer, 2001;Schmader, 2002;Schmader & Johns, 2003;Shih, Pittinsky, & Ambady, 1999;Spencer et al, 1999) or have controlled for SAT math scores for these reasons (e.g., Gonzales, Blanton, & Williams, 2002;Hollis-Sawyer & Sawyer, 2008;Inzlicht & Ben-Zeev, 2000Keller, TESTING HYPOTHESIZED MODERATORS OF STEREOTYPE THREAT 2002, 2007Lesko & Corpus, 2006;Marx & Roman, 2002;Schmader, 2002;Schmader & Johns, 2003;Steele & Aronson, 1995;Vick, Seery, Blascovich, & Weisbuch, 2008;Wout, Danso, Jackson, & Spencer, 2008;Wout, Shih, Jackson, & Sellers, 2009). As Steele (1997) noted, it is those with greatest skill who are expected to suffer the most from stereotype threat, implying those with less skill in the domain will suffer less or not at all.…”
Section: Untested Predictions From Stereotype Threat Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, because the task which the participants performed was calculus based, we used prior GPA derived from grades in calculus classes rather than prior SAT math scores. When appropriate, other studies have used prior grades in math courses as the measure of skill (Hollis-Sawyer & Sawyer, 2008;Keller, 2002Keller, , 2007. Similar to math identification, the adverse effect of stereotype threat on calculus test performance was expected to increase as calculus GPA increased (H2).…”
Section: Untested Predictions From Stereotype Threat Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because items were revised from the original source, only current pilot test results toward reliability can be reported. Pilot testing revealed initial inter-item consistency of items to range from .86 to .89 within sub dimensions (Hollis- Sawyer & Sawyer, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As educators, it is an ethical imperative to focus on the "internal" barriers to life-long learning opportunities (Hollis- Sawyer & Sawyer, 2008;Sawyer & Hollis-Sawyer, 2005;Willis, 1985). With these same efforts toward positive educational design, early socialization and associated life-long adaptation issues for aging non-traditional learners need further investigation to identify effective "positive" messages in education settings (e.g., Peterson, 1983).…”
Section: Contributions Of the Present Research To Field Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies showed that stereotype and social identity threat can impair the performance of Latino Americans in the US (e.g., Armenta, 2010;Hollis-Sawyer & Sawyer, 2008;Schmader & Johns, 2003), and of various immigrant groups in Europe (e.g., from North Africa or the Balkans), who are also confronted with a lowintelligence stereotype within the new residence country (e.g., Appel, 2012;Berjot, Roland-Levy, & Girault-Lidvan, 2011;Chateignier, Dutrévis, Nugier, & Chekroun, 2009). In other studies including immigrant participants, the main effect of the stereotype threat treatment could not be replicated, or findings were mixed (e.g., Wicherts, Dolan, & Hessen, 2005).…”
Section: Stereotype Threat Among Immigrant Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%