2011
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2010.0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Role of Pet Animals in Household Transmission of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A Narrative Review

Abstract: In this narrative review, we found numerous reports suggesting that dogs and cats may play a role in household methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and recurrent MRSA infection in human contacts. Future work should emphasize elucidating more clearly the prevalence of MRSA in household pets and characterize transmission dynamics of MRSA humans and pet animals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By the same token, S. aureus is infrequently isolated from infection and carriage sites of dogs in clinical practice and in epidemiological surveys, and is considered a comparatively infrequent canine pathogen (Beck et al, 2012; Morris et al, 2006; 2010). The dog may act as a potential vector of S. aureus , which raises zoonotic and anthropozoonotic concerns for potential transfer of pathogens, drug resistance, and genetic elements (Misic et al, 2015; Song et al., 2013; Boag et al, 2004; Bramble et al, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the same token, S. aureus is infrequently isolated from infection and carriage sites of dogs in clinical practice and in epidemiological surveys, and is considered a comparatively infrequent canine pathogen (Beck et al, 2012; Morris et al, 2006; 2010). The dog may act as a potential vector of S. aureus , which raises zoonotic and anthropozoonotic concerns for potential transfer of pathogens, drug resistance, and genetic elements (Misic et al, 2015; Song et al., 2013; Boag et al, 2004; Bramble et al, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prospective study in the Netherlands found that prolonged household exposure to MRSA, the age of the individual infected, the diagnosis of eczema in the infected individual, and the number of household members increased the risk of transmission to contacts within the home; the observed risk factors in this study may however not be applicable to countries with a high incidence of CA-MRSA infections [63]. Multiple studies have suggested that domesticated animals play a role in household transmission of S. aureus and that transmission between humans and their pets is likely bi-directional [43, 64–70]. A recent study that used WGS showed that 46 MRSA isolates cultured from cats and dogs in the United Kingdom were interspersed throughout the epidemic MRSA-15 pandemic clade and clustered with a population of human isolates from the same lineage [71].…”
Section: Staphylococcus Aureus Transmission and Disease Within The Homentioning
confidence: 99%
“…73,74 Recent studies in the US and Switzerland show that the presence of human MRSA clones in pet cats and dogs is of public health concern. 75,76 A German study showed carriage of an MRSA variant in several cats.…”
Section: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureusmentioning
confidence: 99%