1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00120756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential refractivity as a similarity variable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a point of clarification, the vertical M profile is not uniquely defined by h d in most MO models including those of Liu et al (1979) and Frederickson et al (2000). Several MO evaporation duct models exists (Cook and Burk 1992;Babin et al 1997;Frederickson et al 2000;Frederickson 2010). We choose NAVSLaM (Frederickson et al 2000;Frederickson 2010) to compute the vertical atmospheric and refractivity profiles in an evaporation duct from bulk parameters (air temperature, humidity, and pressure at a certain height above the sea surface).…”
Section: Dependence Of Refractivity Index On Atmospheric Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a point of clarification, the vertical M profile is not uniquely defined by h d in most MO models including those of Liu et al (1979) and Frederickson et al (2000). Several MO evaporation duct models exists (Cook and Burk 1992;Babin et al 1997;Frederickson et al 2000;Frederickson 2010). We choose NAVSLaM (Frederickson et al 2000;Frederickson 2010) to compute the vertical atmospheric and refractivity profiles in an evaporation duct from bulk parameters (air temperature, humidity, and pressure at a certain height above the sea surface).…”
Section: Dependence Of Refractivity Index On Atmospheric Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For electromagnetic propagation purposes, the environment can be uniquely represented by the range and height‐dependent index of refraction, which itself is a complex function of temperature, humidity, and pressure [ Cook and Burk , 1992]. Therefore the term environmental parameters will be used exclusively for the M profile parameters henceforth.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of relevant researchers have been engaged in the research of evaporation duct model [14]. Many prediction models have been proposed, including Liu-Katsaros-Businger (LKB) model [15], Paulus-Jeske (PJ) model [16], Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) model [17], [18], Musson-Gauthier-Bruth (MGB) model [19], Babin-Young-Carton (BYC) model [20], Naval-Postgraduate-School (NPS) model [21] and CORE 3.0 algorithm model [22], as well as domestic pseudo-refractivity model [23], Universal Evaporation Duct (UED) model [24] and non-iterative flux algorithm evaporation duct prediction model [25]. Due to the complexity of the local geographic and hydrometeorological environment, the practicability of the theoretical prediction model at sea based on the Monin-Obkhov similarity theory of homogeneous and steady atmospheric boundary layer usually has some limitations and large prediction errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%