Potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility

Abstract

The practice of teleworking has been growing steadily in recent years with the development of ICT and the flexibilisation of work. The Covid‐19 pandemic and its stay‐at‐home restrictions have further accelerated this trend. As teleworking reduces the frequency of commuting, it also reduces CO2 emissions and may be seen as a tool to regulate mobility. However, and especially since working from home enables more flexible working, teleworking may have various ‘rebound‘ effects on daily and residential mobility practices. Rebound effects include possible increases in the frequency or distance of journeys, such as an increase in non‐work‐related travel on teleworking days, as well as effects such as residential relocation or multilocal dwelling. In this article we intend to introduce and categorize the existing literature on the potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility. By critically assessing the literature we have identified the major lessons, while also noticing the limits of the research and a scarcity of qualitative approaches to understand how and why people who telework reinvest their non‐commuting time in other forms of mobility. Also missing in the literature is the longitudinal aspect, that is, the consideration of long‐term changes. These gaps have led us to formulate our proposition of a research agenda, where the lifestyle and life course approaches have emerged as crucial tools to understanding the motivations for teleworking and the respective rebound effects on residential and daily mobility.

Effects of Mobility Restrictions on Air Pollution in the Madrid Region during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Post-Pandemic Periods

“…In the seventh period, the concentration of NO 2 and NO x decreased in comparison to the baseline period of 2019, which can indicate that not all private transport trips recovered. This could indicate that the fear of contracting the COVID-19 disease in public transport, reported in numerous studies, such as Hostettler Macias et al (2022) [84] and Park and Kim (2021) [85], decreased significantly. These findings are interesting and should be looked in more depth in a future study.…”

Demand-side climate change mitigation: where do we stand and where do we go?

“…These benefits largely result from the elimination of the commute, reductions in congestion, and reductions in office-based energy consumption. A related review, not in this focus issue, suggests that travel related rebound effects can consume up to one fifth of the emission savings, which still clarifies that telecommuting is largely beneficial to the environment and climate change (Hostettler Macias et al 2022).…”

Exploring barriers and facilitators of different work modalities from employees' perceptions: insights from workers and recommendations for organizations

“…Some teleworkers (10) emphasized that companies provided vaccines, tools and accommodations necessary for a suitable home workspace. Effective teleworking relies on access to computer equipment, Internet connectivity and a suitable workspace, variables that differ by location and country (Hostettler Macias et al, 2022). On-site workers (15) mentioned implementing preventive measures, capacity limitations, ergonomic equipment and attire to mitigate contagion risks.…”