2016
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential process ‘hurdles’ in the use of macroalgae as feedstock for biofuel production in the British Isles

Abstract: This review examines the potential technical and energy balance hurdles in the production of seaweed biofuel, and in particular for the MacroBioCrude processing pipeline for the sustainable manufacture of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from seaweed in the UK.The production of biofuel from seaweed is economically, energetically and technically challenging at scale. Any successful process appears to require both a method of preserving the seaweed for continuous feedstock availability and a method exploiting the entire… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Process inputs, such as the use of a neutralizing agent, phosphate fertilizer and calcium carbonate, in addition to energy utilities in the biorefinery, are all inputs into the process flow that cause environmental hotspots. While our study is to the best of our knowledge the first assessing life cycle environmental impacts of LA production from Laminaria sp., previous studies have already highlighted these energy‐intensive processes as important contributors to environmental impact profiles (Milledge & Harvey, ; Seghetta, Hou, Bastianoni, Bjerre, & Thomsen, ). In Table d, we present the results for the scenario without biomass drying, indicating potential environmental gains when drying and related energy use can be avoided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Process inputs, such as the use of a neutralizing agent, phosphate fertilizer and calcium carbonate, in addition to energy utilities in the biorefinery, are all inputs into the process flow that cause environmental hotspots. While our study is to the best of our knowledge the first assessing life cycle environmental impacts of LA production from Laminaria sp., previous studies have already highlighted these energy‐intensive processes as important contributors to environmental impact profiles (Milledge & Harvey, ; Seghetta, Hou, Bastianoni, Bjerre, & Thomsen, ). In Table d, we present the results for the scenario without biomass drying, indicating potential environmental gains when drying and related energy use can be avoided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dewatering (the mechanical removal of water) generally uses less energy than evaporation, and thus it would appear preferable to minimise the water content of the harvested algae prior to drying. Although coal-fired driers have been used in Ireland for the production of seaweed-meal products [123], the use of fossil fuels to dry seaweed will be costly, have a negative energy balance, and produce unwanted greenhouse gas [32,124]. However, the cost of conventional drying could be reduced if 'waste' heat is available from power generation or large-scale refrigeration plant.…”
Section: Dryingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, "an understanding of ensiling of seaweed is absolutely crucial for a substantial seaweed biofuel industry" [144]. There was some research into the ensilage of seaweed in the 1950s [142], and more recently in both Ireland and the United Kingdom [124,144]. A recent study of ensiling Sargassum muticum concluded that ensiling is an energy-efficient method of preserving seaweed for biofuel, and in particular biogas production, as energy losses are low (<8%) and methane yields are not significantly reduced [34].…”
Section: Ensilagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a low dry matter content [24] and a high rate of decomposition, making storage problematic as with feedstocks of similar characteristics [25,26]. To solve this problem, as part of the "AquaMak" project, a series of ensiling tests were carried out [27].…”
Section: S5 Ensilingmentioning
confidence: 99%