2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.03.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential problems in collection and data processing of luminescence signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is frequently overlooked but the problem has been discussed in a number of publications. 16,[29][30][31][32] The fast heating rate data are unsuitable for kinetic analysis. A second problem is that emission bands normally broaden with increasing temperature and may vary in terms of their luminescence efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is frequently overlooked but the problem has been discussed in a number of publications. 16,[29][30][31][32] The fast heating rate data are unsuitable for kinetic analysis. A second problem is that emission bands normally broaden with increasing temperature and may vary in terms of their luminescence efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rates are low, in contrast with the commonly used higher rates used in many other measurements. High rates are acceptable for dosimetry where only the total signal is of interest, but rapid heating results in major temperature gradients 15,23 and so are inappropriate for the more fundamental investigations of the current work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in numerous systematic errors in signal processing and a failure to exploit the strength of the technique, as recently reviewed in References [1,2]. The reality that starting materials may be poorly characterised relative to the analytical power of the luminescence also means that it can be difficult to usefully compare data from different sources and laboratories.…”
Section: Weaknesses In the Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%