2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of satellite-derived ecosystem functional attributes to anticipate species range shifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
11
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, these RS‐derived functional variables have been suggested as essential biodiversity variables in SDMs to provide early warnings of range shifts and predictions of short‐term fluctuations in suitable conditions for multiple plant species (Alcaraz‐Segura et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, these RS‐derived functional variables have been suggested as essential biodiversity variables in SDMs to provide early warnings of range shifts and predictions of short‐term fluctuations in suitable conditions for multiple plant species (Alcaraz‐Segura et al. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDMs based on functional variables that are closely related to habitat dynamics and ecosystem processes may complement traditional sets of predictor variables describing overall climate conditions or static habitat features (Alcaraz‐Segura et al. ; Arenas‐Castro et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satellite-derived EFAs can, therefore, be used as process-related predictors in biodiversity models, since they provide information about ecosystem processes and properties related to the carbon (e.g., vegetation greenness) and water cycles (e.g., evapotranspiration) or with energy balance (e.g., land surface temperature and albedo). In fact, satellite-derived EFAs are being also tested as candidate EBVs related to the carbon cycle, energy, and radiation balance capable of informing about ecosystem components linked to species conservation status [26,27]. Thus, the incorporation of EFAs into SDMs was found to increase their predictive power and transferability [28], offering the opportunity to cost-effectively monitor multiple endangered species [27,29], at different spatial and temporal scales [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to improve our understanding of the land‐atmosphere interactions, we propose that it is also needed to include information about ecosystem functionality (Bond‐Lamberty et al, ; Petrakis et al, ; Reichstein et al, ). The addition of information on ecosystem functional attributes has enhanced biodiversity models (Alcaraz‐Segura et al, , ; Armas et al, ) and is useful for network design and assessment (Villarreal et al, ). We argue that including information related to environmental state factors along with ecosystem functional heterogeneity could complement bioclimatic information to define ESAs, since ecosystem‐level observations suggest that climate controls are insufficient to explain land‐atmosphere interactions (Reichstein et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecosystem functional traits can be represented by a land surface classification known as EFTs, conceptually defined as patches of the land surface that exchange matter and energy with the atmosphere in a similar way (Alcaraz‐Segura et al, ; Alcaraz‐Segura et al, ; Paruelo et al, ). In practice, EFTs are a yearly varying land surface classification based on satellite‐derived key ecosystem functional attributes (i.e., descriptors of primary productivity, seasonality, and phenology of carbon gains; Alcaraz‐Segura et al, ; Lee et al, ). These attributes are obtained from annual curves of spectral vegetation indices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%