2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000163743.63063.9f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential of Dose Reduction After Marker Placement With Full-Field Digital Mammography

Abstract: Our results indicate that under evaluation of each individual case, a dose reduction of 50% to 75% can be recommended in postinterventional digital mammograms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not evaluate the impact of this combination. In addition, most diagnostic performance experiments involve rating images for the presence of abnormalities, with multiple grades ranging from 4 to 100 being used ( 36 37 ). However, such an approach is limited for many diagnostic tasks when they are performed in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did not evaluate the impact of this combination. In addition, most diagnostic performance experiments involve rating images for the presence of abnormalities, with multiple grades ranging from 4 to 100 being used ( 36 37 ). However, such an approach is limited for many diagnostic tasks when they are performed in a clinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as an extra view, it is expected to contribute to the early detection of breast cancer [15,16]. Finally, low dose mammography images could be applied in post interventional mammography [17], such as marker or wire verification, or in high frequency surveillance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since tomosynthesis is a 3D technique, it is believed that only one view needs to be acquired. 16 In our example, a comparable breast would have been exposed to an average glandular dose (AGD) of about 1.5 mGy using a modern digital mammography system with automatic parameter selection, compared to 2 mGy calculated AGD for tomosynthesis images of our phantom (1.33 times more dose for tomosynthesis compared to a "normal" digital mammography). The especially designed phantom used in this study has a total height of 5 cm (size xy-direction is 10Ă—10 cm) and is composed of six slabs: three slabs of 1-cm-thick breast equivalent material, two slabs of 0.5-cm-thick breast equivalent material containing different objects of interest simulating lesions (slabs A and B) and a 1-cm thick slab of swirl material placed on top of the phantom to simulate breast textured tissue.…”
Section: Tomosynthesis Of the Phantommentioning
confidence: 99%