Potential Negative Ecological Effects of Corridors

Abstract

Despite many studies showing that landscape corridors increase dispersal and species richness for disparate taxa, concerns persist that corridors can have unintended negative effects. In particular, some of the same mechanisms that underlie positive effects of corridors on species of conservation interest may also increase the spread and impact of antagonistic species (e.g., predators and pathogens), foster negative effects of edges, increase invasion by exotic species, increase the spread of unwanted disturbances such as fire, or increase population synchrony and thus reduce persistence. We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the prevalence of each of these negative effects. We found no evidence that corridors increase unwanted disturbance or non-native species invasion; however, these have not been well-studied concerns (1 and 6 studies, respectively). Other effects of corridors were more often studied and yielded inconsistent results; mean effect sizes were indistinguishable from zero. The effect of edges on abundances of target species was as likely to be positive as negative. Corridors were as likely to have no effect on antagonists or population synchrony as they were to increase those negative effects. We found 3 deficiencies in the literature. First, despite studies on how corridors affect predators, there are few studies of related consequences for prey population size and persistence. Second, properly designed studies of negative corridor effects are needed in natural corridors at scales larger than those achievable in experimental systems. Third, studies are needed to test more targeted hypotheses about when corridor-mediated effects on invasive species or disturbance may be negative for species of management concern. Overall, we found no overarching support for concerns that construction and maintenance of habitat corridors may result in unintended negative consequences. Negative edge effects may be mitigated by widening corridors or softening edges between corridors and the matrix. Other negative effects are relatively small and manageable compared with the large positive effects of facilitating dispersal and increasing diversity of native species.

How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review

“…However, potential negative impacts of high connectivity are still a subject of discussion. For example, Haddad et al (2014) found no evidence that corridors increase unwanted disturbances or invasions of non-native species. The dynamics of complex ecosystems are determined by the interaction between slow variables, e.g., soil organic matter and water-holding capacity, and fast variables, e.g., soil mineral nitrogen and water flow.…”

A riparian conservation network for ecological resilience

“…Regardless, although connectivity might facilitate the spread of invasive species and disease or increased disturbance, improved habitat connectivity is a net positive conservation outcome (Hannah et al, 2002;Shafer, 2014). Moreover, Haddad et al (2014) found no broad evidence to support the possible undesirable side-effects of increased habitat connectivity and further suggested that wider corridors and softer corridor edges could ameliorate potential negative impacts.…”

Why non-native grasses pose a critical emerging threat to biodiversity conservation, habitat connectivity and agricultural production in multifunctional rural landscapes

“…The linkages between rural multifunctionality, landscape connectivity and invasive species are in only early stages of investigation (With 2002;Haddad et al 2014). This is surprising, given the obvious mechanistic similarity between NNGs and other agents of landscape fragmentation documented in this paper, viz.…”

“…1e-g), through construction of water management features, livestock exclusion, and revegetation (Ludwig and Tongway 1996). Large multi-value areas can play a vital role in preserving landscape biodiversity Hobbs 1999, Smith et al 2013), but even when spatially restricted they can buffer remnant native vegetation and provide supplementary habitat for native species, a process known as ''matrix softening'' (Haddad et al 2014). Following from this model, management practices that increase the conservation and agro-economic values of a given MRL simultaneously (Fig.…”