2018
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Mitigation and Restoration Actions in Ecosystems Impacted by Seabed Mining

Abstract: Cuvelier et al. Mitigation and Restoration in the Deep Sea and estimation of their possible effect and success. We propose an extensive list of actions that could be considered as recommendations for best environmental practice. The list is not restricted and, depending on the characteristics of the site, additional actions can be considered. For all actions presented here, further research is necessary to fully encompass their potential and contribution to possible mitigation or restoration of the ecosystem.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
(214 reference statements)
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These biological variables plus niche sorting within microhabitats that could accumulate over time (Diamond, 1988;Auster et al, 2005), as well as important stochastic effects (Quattrini et al, 2016), are likely to lead to highly dynamic and heterogeneous assemblages that have high diversity over fine spatial scales. Future human impacts need to be paired with mitigation techniques (e.g., Cuvelier et al, 2018) that preserve an offset of biodiversity that will be disturbed. This is an especially important step as ecosystem recovery is slow enough in the deep sea (Williams et al, 2010;Bennecke and Metaxas, 2017a;Baco et al, 2019) that most human impacts will be very long lasting.…”
Section: Conclusion and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These biological variables plus niche sorting within microhabitats that could accumulate over time (Diamond, 1988;Auster et al, 2005), as well as important stochastic effects (Quattrini et al, 2016), are likely to lead to highly dynamic and heterogeneous assemblages that have high diversity over fine spatial scales. Future human impacts need to be paired with mitigation techniques (e.g., Cuvelier et al, 2018) that preserve an offset of biodiversity that will be disturbed. This is an especially important step as ecosystem recovery is slow enough in the deep sea (Williams et al, 2010;Bennecke and Metaxas, 2017a;Baco et al, 2019) that most human impacts will be very long lasting.…”
Section: Conclusion and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This translates into large areas of seamounts where any coral and sponge assemblages present, along with their associated communities of invertebrates and fishes, would have been damaged or removed by these fishing activities. Seamounts face even greater impacts from the push for mining of deep-sea substrates for semi-precious and precious metals (Halfar and Fujita, 2007;Mengerink et al, 2014;Cuvelier et al, 2018). Seamount slopes that occur from 800 to 2500 m in depth can accrue cobalt-rich manganese crusts, similar to the nodules that accrue on abyssal plains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors may vary over time, relating to environmental conditions and stage of ecological succession (Fujii, 2015). Consequently, artificial structures have a potential role in restoring degraded marine ecosystems such as coral reefs (Rinkevich, 2014), mollusc reefs (Walles et al, 2016), algal forests (Gianni et al, 2013), and have been proposed for restoration of disturbed deep-sea habitats (Cuvelier et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The porosity data further shows that sediment compaction, potentially caused by the weight of the disturbance device (Cuvelier et al, 2018;Hauquier et al, under review) is insignificant at all disturbed sites.…”
Section: Depths Of Small-scale Disturbance Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although a considerable number of environmental impact studies have been conducted in different nodule fields, the prediction of environmental consequences of potential future deepsea mining is still difficult (e.g., Ramirez-Llodra et al, 2011;Jones et al, 2017;Gollner et al, 2017;Cuvelier et al, 2018). In case of the CCZ, the evaluation of the environmental impact of deep-sea mining activities is challenging due to the fact that baseline data on the natural spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability of depositional conditions, benthic communities and the biogeochemical processes in the sediments are scarce (e.g., Mewes et al, 2014;Vanreusel et al, 2016;Mogollón et al, 2016;Juan et al, 2018;Volz et al, 2018;Menendez et al, 2018;Hauquier et al, under review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%