1996
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1041903213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential kernel for two-dimensional random walk

Abstract: It is proved that the potential kernel of a recurrent, aperiodic random walk on the integer lattice ‫ޚ‬ 2 admits an asymptotic expansion of the form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 2.1 and the lemmas also hold with periodic or Neumann boundary conditions, rather than Dirichlet, as discussed below. For the discrete Dirichlet problem (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), it is well known that the maximum of v can be estimated by the maximum of the right side, using the discrete maximum principle, but (2-21) is sharper in dependence on F k .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.1 and the lemmas also hold with periodic or Neumann boundary conditions, rather than Dirichlet, as discussed below. For the discrete Dirichlet problem (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18), it is well known that the maximum of v can be estimated by the maximum of the right side, using the discrete maximum principle, but (2-21) is sharper in dependence on F k .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, there is a distinguished (or fundamental) solution w (d) of (2.5) which has a deep probabilistic meaning: it is a certain multiple of the lattice Green's function of the symmetric nearest-neighbour random walk on Z d (cf. [6,12,25,27]). …”
Section: A Potential Function and Its 1 -Multipliersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…has a positive density on [j − 1, j) × W δ , which is uniformly bounded from below with a bound not depending on either j or K, and that the Lévy distance between µ j g and µ j c is bounded from above by ε K → K→∞ 0, due to (14). Since [j − 1, j) × W δ is a bounded subset of R 3 , an elementary coupling (see, e.g., [6, Theorem 1.2]; the analog for one-dimensional couplings is easy to check) yields a coupling satisfying the analog of (134), but restricted to [j − 1, j).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%