Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1984
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1984.1143304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential integrals for uniform and linear source distributions on polygonal and polyhedral domains

Abstract: Absrrucf-Formulas for the potentials due to uniform and linearly varying source distributions defined on simply shaped domains are SYStematically developed and presented. Domains considered are infinite planar strips, infinite cylinders of polygonal cross sections, planar surfaces with polygonal boundaries, and volumetric regions with polyhedral boundaries. The expressions obtained are compact in form and their application in the numerical solution of electromagnetics problems by the method of moments is illus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
323
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 599 publications
(327 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
323
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, weakly singular integrals are treated by using mainly the singularity subtraction method [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] or the singularity cancellation method [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Despite their widespread usage, both singularity subtraction and singularity cancellation methods fail to meet the requirements for an accurate and efficient numerical integration of weakly singular integrals, as it will be demonstrated by the numerical examples in next sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, weakly singular integrals are treated by using mainly the singularity subtraction method [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] or the singularity cancellation method [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Despite their widespread usage, both singularity subtraction and singularity cancellation methods fail to meet the requirements for an accurate and efficient numerical integration of weakly singular integrals, as it will be demonstrated by the numerical examples in next sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case we use the well-known Rao-Wilton-Glisson (RWG) vector basis/testing functions [43], together with the analytical extraction procedures of [44][45][46][47] for the accurate evaluation of singular and hypersingular integrals that appear in Equations (24) and (25). This results in a linear system of N equations and N unknowns, N being the number of surface RWG basis functions used to expand the electric and magnetic currents, that can be written as follows:…”
Section: Methods Of Moments For Surface Integral Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In virtue of the results obtained in Wilton et al [1984], the integral (A4) can be expressed in terms of three line integrals. Let us consider the geometrical variables depicted in Figure A1, where we have represented a triangular cell employed when a surface is meshed using classical RWG basis functions.…”
Section: A1 Calculation Of I (Sing)mentioning
confidence: 99%