2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00884.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential influence of tacrolimus and steroid avoidance on early graft function in pediatric renal transplantation

Abstract: With the increasing adoption of steroid-sparing immunosuppression protocols in renal transplantation, it is important to evaluate any adverse effects of steroid avoidance on graft function. Early graft function, measured by CrCl was retrospectively studied in 158 consecutive pediatric renal transplant recipients from 1996 to 2005, receiving either steroid-free or steroid-based immunosuppression. Patients receiving steroid-free immunosuppression vs. steroid-based immunosuppression had no difference change in Cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other explanations for the worse univariable outcomes in the MS group indude a higher proportion of African Americans, a higher proportion of patients who underwent transplantation in the earlier era, and a higher proportion of patients with a previous sternotomy, all of which have been associated with a higher risk of graft loss (1, 9, 10). The successful use of SF maintenance immunosuppression in our analysis is consistent with single-center and dual-center reports of SF maintenance immunosuppression in heart, liver, and renal transplantation (2, 3, 11, 12). While there are no other studies in pediatric HT directly comparing graft survival in patients with and without MS use, multiple single-center studies of pediatric HT have reported outcomes with an SF maintenance immunosuppression protocol with excellent results (2, 8, 13-16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other explanations for the worse univariable outcomes in the MS group indude a higher proportion of African Americans, a higher proportion of patients who underwent transplantation in the earlier era, and a higher proportion of patients with a previous sternotomy, all of which have been associated with a higher risk of graft loss (1, 9, 10). The successful use of SF maintenance immunosuppression in our analysis is consistent with single-center and dual-center reports of SF maintenance immunosuppression in heart, liver, and renal transplantation (2, 3, 11, 12). While there are no other studies in pediatric HT directly comparing graft survival in patients with and without MS use, multiple single-center studies of pediatric HT have reported outcomes with an SF maintenance immunosuppression protocol with excellent results (2, 8, 13-16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other explanations for the worse univariable outcomes in the MS group indude a higher proportion of African Americans, a higher proportion of patients who underwent transplantation in the earlier era, and a higher proportion of patients with a previous sternotomy, all of which have been associated with a higher risk of graft loss (1,9,10). The successful use of SF maintenance immunosuppression in our analysis is consistent with single-center and dual-center reports of SF maintenance immunosuppression in heart, liver, and renal transplantation (2,3,11,12). While there are no other studies in pediatric HT directly comparing graft survival in patients with and without MS use, multiple single-center studies of pediatric HT have reported outcomes with an SF maintenance immunosuppression protocol with excellent results (2,8,(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Centres were categorized by the use of a steroid sparing immunosuppressive regimen or not. A steroid sparing immunosuppressive protocol administers corticosteroids for a short period of time (typically 7-14 days) in the early posttransplant period whereas non-sparing centres maintain steroids throughout the first 6 months or longer [40,41]. We found that CL/F was decreased by 30% in patients transplanted at a steroid sparing centre.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 69%