1954
DOI: 10.1128/jb.68.5.545-548.1954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Infectious Hazards of Laboratory Techniques Ii

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of particles aerosolized upon opening lyophilized cultures depended upon the consistency of the end product. Fluffier end products tend to create more concentrated aerosols (15). Table 1 shows that inclusion of mother liquor in the suspending menstruum reduces the aerosol concentration approximately fourfold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of particles aerosolized upon opening lyophilized cultures depended upon the consistency of the end product. Fluffier end products tend to create more concentrated aerosols (15). Table 1 shows that inclusion of mother liquor in the suspending menstruum reduces the aerosol concentration approximately fourfold.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photography (76) and air sampling (4,55,130,146,147,193) have shown that removing the lid from a Waring Blendor, removing the closure of a shaken culture, plunging a loop into a flame, and numerous other procedures may release migroorganisms into the environment. Lyo philization, animal inoculation, and egg inoculation and harvesting have also been shown to produce aerosols (143)(144)(145). It is little wonder, then, that infections have occurred in persons who were known only to have worked with the agent involved.…”
Section: Potential Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, atmospheric sampling studies performed at Fort Detrick demonstrated that significant aerosolization of organisms occurred from performing routine laboratory procedures such as removing lids or stoppers (e.g., from Waring Blenders or a shaken culture), flaming inoculation needles, pipetting fluids, lyophilization, animal inoculation, egg inoculation and harvesting, and disturbing contaminated animal cage litter. 1,3,4,9,11,[14][15][16][17][22][23][24] Consequently, a number of other interventions may have resulted in decreases in exposures and infections, including the discontinuation of mouth pipetting, stricter requirements for wearing longsleeve operating gowns, use of nonbreakable plastic Petri dishes, and use of Luer-Lok syringes (to prevent exposures resulting from the separation of the syringe and needle). 4,11,23 Occupational illnesses occurring in biodefense research today are expected to be less frequent than observed in the offensive biological warfare program for several reasons.…”
Section: Figure 5 Vee Cases Diagnosed At Fort Detrick From 1943 To 1mentioning
confidence: 99%