2020
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6925e2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential Indirect Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Use of Emergency Departments for Acute Life-Threatening Conditions — United States, January–May 2020

Abstract: On March 13, 2020, the United States declared a national emergency in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Subsequently, states enacted stay-athome orders to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and reduce the burden on the U.S. health care system. CDC* and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) † recommended that health care systems prioritize urgent visits and delay elective care to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 in health care settings. By May … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
289
2
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
20
289
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…1 In addition to a delay in AIS care, such as endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), there has been a significant decline in AIS hospitalizations and procedures. [2][3][4][5] Previous studies demonstrated an association between COIVD-19 and poor outcome in patients presenting with AIS. 6 7 The effect of COIVD-19 on the clinical outcomes of EVT-treated patients has not been adequately assessed in a diverse sample of United States' hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In addition to a delay in AIS care, such as endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), there has been a significant decline in AIS hospitalizations and procedures. [2][3][4][5] Previous studies demonstrated an association between COIVD-19 and poor outcome in patients presenting with AIS. 6 7 The effect of COIVD-19 on the clinical outcomes of EVT-treated patients has not been adequately assessed in a diverse sample of United States' hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the decrease in admissions for acute myocardial infarction was unrelated to the local prevalence of COVID-19; the lockdown was applied irrespective of the local magnitude of the pandemic, and the whole hospitalisation structure was affected, with elective procedures postponed and a possible effect on health workers, including the emergency services, as has been previously observed in other countries. 11 Both the fact that the decrease was more marked for patients with NSTEMI, a condition in which chest pain is usually less intense than in STEMI, and the fact that an increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests has been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, 12,13 support this hypothesis, as does the fact that the decrease was more marked in older patients. However, it is noteworthy that in the Paris cardiac arrest survey the increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests was limited to the first 2 weeks after lockdown, 13 whereas the decrease in admissions for acute myocardial infarctions in the FRENCHIE registry remained constant over 4 weeks in all regions, including the Paris area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thirty-nine out-of-hospital SARS-CoV-2-associated deaths occurred at home or in the ED among persons aged <21 years. In the United States, significant reductions in ED visits (8) and childhood immunizations (9) occurred during March-April 2020, suggesting that necessary care might be delayed or deferred during the pandemic. Although infants, children, and adolescents are more likely to have milder COVID-19 illness than are adults (3), complications, including MIS-C (6) and respiratory failure (5,6), do occur in these populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%