2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01332-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential impacts of a novel integrated extracorporeal-CPR workflow using an interventional radiology and immediate whole-body computed tomography system in the emergency department

Abstract: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) can be associated with increased survival and neurologic benefits in selected patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, there remains insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of ECPR for patients with OHCA. A novel integrated trauma workflow concept that utilizes a sliding computed tomography (CT) scanner and interventional radiology (IR) system, named a hybrid emergency room system (HERS), allowing emergency therapeutic interven… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We limited the analysis to severe trauma patients without severe TBI since a previous study suggested that the significant effects of the hybrid ER on mortality were identified in exsanguinating patients [7]. As these rooms have been used also for severe TBI patients and nontrauma patients in several tertiary care hospitals [21][22][23], the estimated ICER obtained from the model excluding these patients could be imprecise. However, the hybrid ER system is expected to be cost-effective even if we include these patients in the analysis as the investment costs and the depreciation period will not change; the estimated ICER was already lower than the willingnessto-pay threshold under the conservative assumption that this room was annually used for only 68 severe trauma patients without severe TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We limited the analysis to severe trauma patients without severe TBI since a previous study suggested that the significant effects of the hybrid ER on mortality were identified in exsanguinating patients [7]. As these rooms have been used also for severe TBI patients and nontrauma patients in several tertiary care hospitals [21][22][23], the estimated ICER obtained from the model excluding these patients could be imprecise. However, the hybrid ER system is expected to be cost-effective even if we include these patients in the analysis as the investment costs and the depreciation period will not change; the estimated ICER was already lower than the willingnessto-pay threshold under the conservative assumption that this room was annually used for only 68 severe trauma patients without severe TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, approximately 10% of institutions had the so‐called hybrid ER. Several studies on ECPR in hybrid ER have been recently reported 8,10 . This system has the possibility of seamless ECPR from ECMO induction to CAG, followed by percutaneous coronary intervention without any patient transfer 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on ECPR in hybrid ER have been recently reported 8,10 . This system has the possibility of seamless ECPR from ECMO induction to CAG, followed by percutaneous coronary intervention without any patient transfer 10 . Regarding the historical rate of ECPR, more than one‐third of institutions carried out ECPR on 10–19 patients/year, which was higher than that of the former study with 40% of institutions having 0–1 patients/year in the USA in 2016 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20] We limited the analysis to severe trauma patients without severe TBI since a previous study suggested that the signi cant effects of the hybrid ER on mortality were identi ed in exsanguinating patients. [7] As these rooms have been used also for severe TBI patients and non-trauma patients in several tertiary care hospitals [21][22][23], the estimated ICER obtained from the model excluding these patients could be imprecise. However, the hybrid ER system is expected to be cost-effective even if we include these patients in the analysis as the investment costs and the depreciation period will not change; the estimated ICER was already lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold under the conservative assumption that this room was annually used for only 68 severe trauma patients without severe TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%