Potential Impacts in Citizens’ Privacy of using Federated Identity Management to Offer e-Government Services

Navas, Jorge; Beltrán, Marta

doi:10.5220/0007797703500355

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Navas et al [10] explained how different federated identification techniques use third parties with their identification solution. Cloud services with distributed centralized architectures, such as Facebook and Google, are well-known examples.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Decentralized Identity Approaches

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Decentralization is essential when trust and performance must not depend on a single organization. Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLTs) and Decentralized Hash Tables (DHTs) are examples where the DLT is useful for transactional events, and the DHT is useful for large-scale data storage. The combination of these two technologies can meet many challenges. The blockchain is a DLT with immutable history protected by cryptographic signatures in data blocks. Identification is an essential issue traditionally provided by centralized trust anchors. Self-sovereign identities (SSIs) are proposed decentralized models where users can control and manage their identities with the help of DHT. However, slowness is a challenge among decentralized identification systems because of many connections and requests among participants. In this article, we focus on decentralized identification by DLT and DHT, where users can control their information and store biometrics. We survey some existing alternatives and address the performance challenge by comparing different decentralized identification technologies based on execution time and throughput. We show that the DHT and machine learning model (BioIPFS) performs better than other solutions such as uPort, ShoCard, and BBID.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Decentralized Identity Approaches

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward

Dobrolyubova

2021

NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital transformation is the modern mainstream of social and economic development promising significant digital dividends to citizens and businesses worldwide. The theory highlights the importance of digitalization for optimizing the public value of government services for citizens; however, despite the high enthusiasm about the prospects of digital transformation in public administration, there is little literature on measuring actual benefits this process might provide to all stakeholders concerned. While some recent research suggests high correlation between governance indicators and e-government development, the causality between the two is not confirmed statistically for most public administration indicators. International indices used to measure government digitalization (such as the UN E-Government Development Index) often concentrate only on e-services and are based on measuring the availability rather than the actual use or quality of such modes of service delivery; they concentrate more on measuring G2C and, to some extent, G2B interactions and often omit the effects of digitalization for the G2G and G2E dimensions. The EU Digital economy and society index (DESI) is one of the most advanced cases for measuring the progress of digitalization in the EU, but even in this case the costs of digitalization and potential risks of digital government are not fully accounted for. The paper provides an extensive review of theoretical and practical approaches to measuring government digitalization, identifies key limitations and proposes some steps for enhancing the existing practices. The paper argues that government digital transformation should not be performed for its own sake but should be a means for raising effectiveness and efficiency of public administration. Therefore, both benefits and risks of digital transformation of performing all core government functions for various stakeholders (citizens, businesses, government itself, and public officials) should be accounted for.

show abstract

Potential Impacts in Citizens’ Privacy of using Federated Identity Management to Offer e-Government Services

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Comparative Analysis of Decentralized Identity Approaches

Comparative Analysis of Decentralized Identity Approaches

Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About