2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.114986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Potential impact of IVIG treatment on Lyme serology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the prevalence of anti-Bbsl antibodies depends on geographical region [8], possibly explaining the difference in apparent seroconversion between patients receiving Nanogam, a Dutch product, and Privigen, produced in either the USA or Germany. The finding that the C6 Lyme index was positive in Nanogam and negative in Privigen, is in accordance with previous findings [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the prevalence of anti-Bbsl antibodies depends on geographical region [8], possibly explaining the difference in apparent seroconversion between patients receiving Nanogam, a Dutch product, and Privigen, produced in either the USA or Germany. The finding that the C6 Lyme index was positive in Nanogam and negative in Privigen, is in accordance with previous findings [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) are used in the treatment of inflammatory neuromuscular disorders, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and myositis [1,2]. IVIg consist of pooled polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) immunoglobulins from at least a thousand donors per batch, including antibodies directed towards different microorganisms that the donors have encountered such as Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl) [3]. Because Lyme borreliosis is an important differential diagnosis in patients with CIDP, serological testing for Bbsl is frequently performed [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes false‐positive Galactomann antigen tests for aspergillosis, 8,28,29 false‐positive serological tests for syphillis, 5,29,30 and false‐positive rK39 rapid diagnostic tests for leishmaniasis 6 . There are also false‐positive results for a wide range of infectious agents (viral, bacterial, and protozoal) in human patients receiving immunoglobulin therapy IV 31‐35 . The mode of interference in the Leishmania assay in the described case could be associated with the paraprotein cross‐linking the antigen with the conjugate antibody, 28 or an inability to remove unbound antibody conjugate by the washing procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%